期刊文献+

MTHFR C667T多态性与先兆子痫易感性的荟萃分析 被引量:3

MTHFR C667T Polymorphism and Preeclampsia Risk: A Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨MTHFRC667T基因多态性对先兆子痫(PE)易感性的影响。方法检索CBMdisc、Pubmed等数据库,按纳入标准纳入有关MTHFRC667T基因多态性与PE的病例对照研究进行荟萃分析。结果共纳入24篇文献(26个病例对照研究),共计PE患者3017例,对照者4910例。研究分析显示MTHFRC667T基因多态性与PE存在明显关联[基因频率对比的OR(95%CI)=1.17(1.05~1.30),POR=0.006;隐性遗传对比模型的OR(95%CI)=1.18(1.01~1.38),POR=0.047;显性遗传对比模型的OR(95%CI)=1.20(1.08~1.34),POR=0.001;纯合子对比模型的OR(95%CI)=1.27(1.07~1.52),POR=0.008]。亚组分析显示,MTHFRC667T基因多态性与PE在亚洲人种中存在明显关联,但在欧洲人群及非洲分群中不存在明显关联。结论 MTHFRC667T多态性与PE易感性存在明显关联,但这种关联关系存在明显人种差异。 Objective To approach the effect of MTHFR C667T polymorphism on the risk of preeclampsia( PE) . Methods Searches of the published literature were conducted in PubMed and CBM databases. All eligible studies about the association between MTHFR C667T polymorphism and PE risk were included according to the inclusion criterion. Results 24 original papers( 26 case-control individual stud- ies) were included in this Meta-analysis,including a total of 3017 cases and 4910 control. The results indi- cated that MTHFR C667T polymorphism was significantly associated with PE risk[T vs. C: OR( 95% CI) = 1. 17( 1. 05-1. 30) ,POR = 0. 006; Recessive model: OR( 95% CI) = 1. 18( 1. 01-1. 38) ,POR = 0. 047; Dominant model: OR( 95% CI) = 1. 20( 1. 08-1. 34) ,POR = 0. 001; Homozygote model: OR( 95% CI) = 1. 27( 1. 07-1. 52) ,POR = 0. 008]. Subgroup analyses based on ethnicity showed that the associa- tion was significant in Asians,but not in Caucasians and Africans. Conclusion MTHFR C667T polymorphism is associated with PE risk,but the association differs obviously among different ethnical groups.
出处 《医学综述》 2010年第13期2059-2063,共5页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 先兆子痫 MTHFRC667T 基因多态性 荟萃分析 Preeclampsia MTHFR C667T Gene polymorphism Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Redman CW,Sargent IL.Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia[J].Science,2005,10,308 (5728):1592 -1594.
  • 2Sibai B,Dekker G,Kupferminc M.Pre-eclampsia[J].Lancet,2005,365 (9461):785-799.
  • 3Mütze S,Rudnik-Schneborn S,Zerres K,et al.Genes and the preeclampsia syndrome[J].J Perinat Med,2008,36 (1):38 -58.
  • 4Cochran WC.The combination of estimates from different experiments[J].Biometrics,1954,10 (1):101-129.
  • 5Mantel N,Haenszel W.Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,1959,22(4):719-748.
  • 6DerSimonian R,Laird N.Meta-analysis in clinical trials[J].Control Clin Trials,1986,7 (3):177-188.
  • 7Egger M,Davey Smith G,Schneider M,et al.Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple,graphical test[J].BMJ,1997,315 (7109):629-634.
  • 8沈旭娜,黄引平,唐少华,张常乐,陈文殊.四氢叶酸还原酶基因多态性与子痫前期相关性的研究[J].实用妇产科杂志,2009,25(4):236-238. 被引量:4
  • 9张新宇,孙丹,孙杰.血浆同型半胱氨酸与子痫前期发病的关系[J].中华围产医学杂志,2008,11(4):245-248. 被引量:2
  • 10张战红,张荣君,刘爱民,许茜,刘振红.eNOS基因和MTHFR基因多态性与子痫前期发病关系的研究[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2007,15(11):21-23. 被引量:5

二级参考文献47

共引文献29

同被引文献71

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部