期刊文献+

Mixture Normal Models in which the Proportions of Susceptibility are Related to Dose Levels

Mixture Normal Models in which the Proportions of Susceptibility are Related to Dose Levels
原文传递
导出
摘要 A problem that frequently occurs in biological experiments with laboratory animals is that some subjects are less susceptible to the treatment group than others. Finite mixture models have traditionally been used to describe the distribution of responses in treated subjects for such studies. In this paper, we first study the mixture normal model with multi-levels and multiple mixture sub-populations under each level, with particular attention being given to the model in which the proportions of susceptibility are related to dose levels, then we use EM-algorithm to find the maximum likelihood estimators of model parameters. Our results are generalizations of the existing results. Finally, we illustrate realistic significance of the above extension based on a set of real dose-response data.
出处 《Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica》 SCIE CSCD 2010年第3期463-472,共10页 应用数学学报(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10571073) Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 20070183023) Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, Scientific Research Fund of Jilin University (No. 200810024)
关键词 DOSE-RESPONSE EM-ALGORITHM mixture normal models SUSCEPTIBILITY Dose-response, EM-algorithm, mixture normal models, susceptibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Boos, D.D., Brownie, C. Testing for a treatment effect in the presence of nonresponders. Biometrics, 42: 191-197 (1986).
  • 2Boos, D.D., Brownie, C. Mixture models for continuous data in dose-response studies when some animals are unaffected by treatment. Biometrics, 47:1489-1504 (1991).
  • 3Chen, J.J., Kodell, R.L., Gaylor, D.W. Risk assessment for non-quantal toxic effects. In: Fan, A.M., Chang, L.W. (Eds.), Toxicology and Risk Assessment: Principles, Methods, and Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York. 1996.
  • 4Crump, K.S. Calculation of benchmark doses from continuous data. Risk Anal., 15:79-89 (1995).
  • 5Conover, W.J., Salsburg, D.S. Locally most powerful tests for treatment effects when only a subset of patients can be expected to respond to treatment. Biometrics, 44:189-196 (1988).
  • 6Good, P.L. Detection of a treatment effect when not all experimental subjects will respond to treatment. Biometrics, 35:483-489 (1979).
  • 7Kodell, R.L., Chen,J.J., Gaylor, D.W. Neurotoxicity modelling for risk assessment. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 22:24-29 (1995).
  • 8Kodell, R.L., West, R.W. Upper confidence limits on excess risk for quantitative responses. Risk Anal.,13:177-182 (1993).
  • 9Razzaghi, M., Nanthakumar, A. On using Lehmann alternatives with nonresponders. Mathematical Biosciences, 80:69-83 (1992).
  • 10Razzaghi, M., Nanthakumar, A. A distributionfree test for detecting a treatment effect in the presence of nonresponders. Biometrical Journal, 36:373-384 (1994).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部