期刊文献+

不同粘结系统对纤维桩粘结强度的对比分析 被引量:3

不同粘结系统对纤维桩粘结强度的对比分析
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨三种复合树脂核材料与玻璃纤维桩的微拉伸粘接强度,为临床提供相关病例的治疗依据。方法将45颗健康离体上颌中切牙随机分为3组。根管预备后选用三种粘结剂(可乐丽菲露AP-X、Ceram-X、ParaCore双重固化复合树脂)分别粘结直径1.2mm玻璃纤维桩。将牙沿垂直牙根长轴方向片切成厚度为1mm的薄片。用万能力学实验机进行微推出测试,用体视显微镜观察断裂方式。对粘结强度及断裂类型进行统计学分析。结果 ParaCore与Ceram-X的微拉伸粘结强度显著高于AP-X(P<0.05),ParaCore和Ceram-X与纤维桩的微拉伸粘结强度没有显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 ParaCore和Ceram-X与玻璃纤维桩是适于临床塑核使用的粘结材料,其粘结性能较好。 Objective To investigate the bond strength of 3 kinds of adhesive systems to fiber post,provide case support for relative clinical study.Methods 45 healthy maxillary central incisors in vitro were randomly divided into 3 groups.Use 3 kinds of adhesive systems(AP-X,Ceram-X, ParaCore)to adhere 1.2mm fiber post.Cut the tooth along the Perpendicular to the long axis of root.Do the Micro-launch testing by universal mechanical testing machine,and observe the fracture mode by Stereomicroscope.Do statistical analysis for the bond strength and fracture mode. Results The bond strength of ParaCore and Ceram-X are significantly higher than AP-X,get p-value0.05.The bond strength between ParaCore and Ceram-X are no significant difference,get p-value0.05.Conclusion ParaCore and Ceram-X were suitable for clinical using plastic adhesive material. They have excellent bond performance.
出处 《当代医学》 2010年第20期4-5,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 粘结系统 纤维桩 粘结强度 Adhesive Systems Fiber Post Bond Strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1肖云,代静,郭泽清,庄炯森.不同粘结剂对玻璃纤维桩固位力影响的研究[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(1):98-100. 被引量:10
  • 2王婧婧,陈亚明,陈峰,孟庆飞,陈丽娟,叶克刚.两种纤维桩固位影响因素的剪切黏结实验研究[J].口腔医学,2007,27(2):89-91. 被引量:6
  • 3Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, et al. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization[J].DentMater, 2005, 21:437-444
  • 4Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(4).. 431-437
  • 5Monticelli F, Goracci C, FerrariM. Micromorphology of the fiber post-resin core unit: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation[J].DentMater, 2004, 20(2): 176-183
  • 6Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between sur face area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-Evaluation of a microtensile bond test [J]. Dent Mater, 1994, 10(5): 236-240
  • 7Aksornmuanga J, Foxtonb Rm, nakajimaa M, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz Iibre post [J]. Dentisity, 2004, 32 (3): 443-450
  • 8Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2003, 134(10): 1382-1390
  • 9Sadek FT, MonticeUi F, Goracci C, et al. Bond strength performance of different resin composites used as core materials around fiber posts[J]. Dent Mater, 2007, 23(1): 95-99
  • 10Love RM,Purton DG. The effect of serrations on carbon fiber postsretention within the root canal, core retention and post rigidity. Int J Prosthodont,1996,9(5) :484 -488.

共引文献37

同被引文献57

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部