期刊文献+

格列美脲治疗2型糖尿病有效性及安全性系统评价 被引量:17

Glimepiride for Type 2 Diabetes:A Systematic Review of Its Effectiveness and Safety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本研究旨在探讨格列美脲治疗2型糖尿病降糖的疗效,并对其安全性进行评价。方法选择我院2008年1月~2010年2月收治的100例2型糖尿病患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组各50例,观察组给予格列美脲治疗,对照组采用格列本脲治疗,疗程3个月,观察比较两组治疗前后空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2h血糖(2hPPG)、BIM、血脂、血压的变化以及不良反应情况。结果治疗组50例采用格列美脲治疗的总有效率为94.0%(47/50),明显高于对照组有效率70.0%,两组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗3个月后,FBG、2hPBG、BMI均明显降低(P<0.05),且治疗组下降更明显,但两组间治疗前后分别比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组经3个月治疗后,两组的血脂TC、TG、HDL-C、LDL-C指标及血压指标SBP、DBP均变化不明显,两组组内及组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组共计出现低血糖、头痛、腹痛、腹部不适2例,经对症处理后明显好转,不良反应的发生率为4.0%(2/50),对照组出现头晕、胃部不适等共8例,不良反应的发生率为16.0%(8/50),经对症治疗后均缓解或消失。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论格列美脲治疗2型糖尿病疗效较好,不良反应发生率较低,且可明显降低FBG、2hPBG,是一种值得临床推荐的安全、有效、理想的降糖药物。 Objective To explore the hypoglycemic effect of glimepiride on type 2 diabetes and its security evaluation. Methods We divided 100 cases of type 2 diabetes in our hospital from Jan. 2008 to Feb.2010 randomly divided into two groups: observation group and control group, each having 50 cases, and the observation group was given glimepiride for 3 months and the control group received glibenclamide for the same time. The fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial 2h plasma glucose (2hPPG), B/M, blood lipids, blood pressure change and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 94.0% (47/50), much higher than that (70.0%) of the control group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). FBG, 2hPBG and BMI were significantly lowered in both groups after 3- month treatment (P〈0.05) and the treatment group showed a more significantly decrease, with no significant difference between the two groups before and after treatment (P〉0.05). There were no significant changes in lipids TC, TG, HDL-C and LDL-C and blood pressure SBP and DBP in both either group and between the two groups after 3-month treatment, showing no significant difference (P〉0.05). Two cases showed hypo- glycemia, headache, abdominal pain and abdominal discomfort in the observation group which markedly improved after symptomatic treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions being 4.0% (2/50). Eight cases showed dizziness and of stomach discomfort in the control group, which were relieved after treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions being 16.0% (8/50). There was a significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups by Chi-square test (P〈0.05). Conclusion Glimepiride has a better treat- ment effect on type 2 diabetes, with a lower incidence of adverse reactions, and it can significantly reduce the FBG and 2hPBG and is safe and effective, ideal hypoglycemic drug, worth a clinical recommendation
作者 郭钦惠
出处 《中国现代医生》 2010年第19期3-5,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 格列美脲 2型糖尿病 不良反应 Glimepiride 2 diabetes mellitus Adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1叶任高,陆再英.内科学[M].第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:787-788.
  • 2吴桢,周树娥.目前临床评价最优的磺脲类降糖药——格列美脲[J].实用糖尿病杂志,2008,4(6):54-56. 被引量:18
  • 3Gerieh J, Raskin P, Jcan-Louis L, et al .PRESERVE-beta : two-year efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with nateglinide or glyburide plus mefformin[J]. Diabetes Care.2005,28(9) : 2093-2099.
  • 4何群,何涛,陈刚,王志坚,周炳胜.格列美脲治疗2型糖尿病的疗效及安全性[J].中原医刊,2007,34(11):46-47. 被引量:2
  • 5Hazama Y,Matsuhisa M, Ohtoshi K,et al. Beneficial effects of nateglinide on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes[]]. Diabetes Res Clin Pratt,2006,71 (3) : 261-265.
  • 6Campbell IW. Nateglinide-current and future role in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J].Int J Clin Pract, 2005, 59(10): 1218-1228.
  • 7Rosenstock J, Hassman DR, Madder RD, et al. Repaglinide versus nateglinide monotherapy:a randomized,muhicenter study[J]. Diabetes Care, 2004,26(6) : 1269.

二级参考文献7

共引文献228

同被引文献128

引证文献17

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部