摘要
编年体虽经干宝倡导、改良而久晦得显,然其与纪传体颉颃史坛之格局,仅存续至5世纪三四十年代,而告终于范晔《后汉书》对纪传体编纂方式的改进。总体上不足以与同期纪传史分庭抗礼的两晋南北朝编年史,之所以如此备受刘知几的推崇,其关键就在于它们多能遵行自《春秋》《左传》以来的编年史之定式,注重宣扬史学的政教义理功用,从而契合了刘氏史以致用的价值观念与学术主张。
By means of Gan Bao＇s advocating and improvement, chronicles were not only restored in the early fourth century, but also kept pace with the biography until the forties of the fifth century. They were much favored by Liu Zhiji because of their conformity with the stereotype that had been followed in the Chinese classics produced before the Qin Dynasty as well as their emphasis on the didactic functions of history and thus their agreement with his values and claims of practicality orientation.
出处
《宁波大学学报（人文科学版）》
2010年第4期61-66,共6页
Journal of Ningbo University：Liberal Arts Edition
关键词
干宝
范晔
何之元
刘知几
史体优劣论
Gan Bao
Fan Ye
He Zhiyuan
Liu Zhiji
advantages and disadvantages of historiographical forms
