期刊文献+

道德风险条件下的供应链质量控制策略研究 被引量:29

Supply Chain Quality Control Strategy Under Condition of Moral Hazard
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于委托代理理论,研究了道德风险条件下如何控制供应链质量的问题.建立了供应商和购买商期望收益函数,考虑了供应商存在单边道德风险(质量预防水平隐匿)和购买商存在单边道德风险(质量检验水平隐匿),以及存在双边道德风险(质量预防水平和质量检验水平均隐匿)三种情况下,如何设计质量合同设计.运用最优化原理,求解供应商和购买商的道德风险值,并量化描述所支付的信息租金.仿真实验表明:当供应商存在单边道德风险时,购买商支付的信息租金和期望收益将减少,供应商的期望收益将增加;当购买商存在单边道德风险时,供应商支付的信息租金和期望收益将减少,购买商的期望收益将增加;当存在双边道德风险时,供应链支付的信息租金为供应商和购买商存在单边道德风险时所支付的信息租金之和,供应链联合期望收益的损失最大. Based on principal-agent theory,this paper presents a study of the problem of quality control strategy in supply chain under the condition of moral hazard.We set up the expected revenue function of suppliers and buyers to design the qucontract in the following three cases such as the single moral hazard on the part of the supplier(quality prevention probability concealed) and the single moral hazard on the part of the buyer(quality inspection probability concealed),and double moral hazard(both quality prevention probability and quality inspection probability concealed).According to the optimization theory,the supplier's and buyer's moral hazard values were solved.A quantitative description of the information rents was presented and a simulation test was made.The simulation results show that when there is a single moral hazard on the part of the supplier,the buyer's information rents and expected revenues will reduce,supplier's expected revenues will increase;when there is a single moral hazard on the part of the buyer,the supplier's information rents and expected revenues will reduce,buyer's expected revenues will increase;when there is a double moral hazard,the information rents of supplier chain are the sum of supplier's and buyer's information rents in single moral hazard,the loss of the jointed expected revenues of the supply chain will be maximum.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期1092-1098,共7页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70832005) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70772077) 上海市重点学科建设资助项目(B310)
关键词 供应链 委托代理关系 道德风险 质量控制 supply chain principal-agent relationship moral hazard quality control
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1尤建新,张建同,杜学美.质量管理学[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2008.
  • 2Joseph M Juran,Blanton A Godfrey.朱兰质量管理手册[M].5版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:396-415.
  • 3Van Ackere Ann.The Principal/agent paradigm:its relevance to various functional fields[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1993,70(1):83.
  • 4Starbird S Andrew.The effect of acceptance sampling and risk aversion on the quality delivered by supplier[J].Journal of the Operational Research Society,1994,45(3):309.
  • 5Diane J Reybiers,Charles S Tapiero.The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producer contracts[J].Management Science,1995,41(10):1581.
  • 6Robert Puelz,Arthur Snow.Optimal incentive contracting with ex-ante and ex-post moral hazard:theory and evidence[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1997,14(2):169.
  • 7Stanley Baiman,Paul E Fischer,Madhav V Rajan.Information,contracts,and quality costs[J].Management Science,2000,46(6):776.
  • 8Stanley Baiman,Paul E Fischer,Madhav V Rajan.Performance measurement and design in supply chains[J].Management Science,2001,47(1):173.
  • 9Charles J Gorbet,Xavier de Groote.A supplier optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information[J].Management Science,2000,46(3):444.
  • 10Emilio Barucci,Fausto Gozz,Andrzej Swiech.Incentive compatibility constraints and dynamic programming in continuous time[J].Journal of Mathematical Economics,2000,34(4):471.

二级参考文献56

  • 1姬小利,王宁生.信息不对称情况下的VMI协调机制设计[J].系统工程,2004,22(11):24-28. 被引量:17
  • 2李丽君,黄小原,庄新田.双边道德风险条件下供应链的质量控制策略[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):42-47. 被引量:92
  • 3郭琼,杨德礼.需求信息不对称下基于期权的供应链协作机制的研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(9):1466-1471. 被引量:22
  • 4蔡宣三.最优化管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1983.470-476.
  • 5Stanley B, Paul E, Madhav V. Performance measurement and design in supply chains[J ]. Management Science, 2001,47(1 ):173- 188.
  • 6Stanley B, Paul E, Madhav V. Information, contracting, and quality costs[J]. Management Science, 2000,46(6):776-789.
  • 7Starbird S. Penalties, rewards, and inspection: provisions for quality in supply chain contracts[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2001,52(1):109- 115.
  • 8Reyniers D, Tapiero C. The delievery arid control of quality in supplier-producer contracts[J]. Management Science, 1995,41(1):1581 - 1589.
  • 9Starbird S. The effect of acceptance sampling and risk aversion on the quality delivered by suppliers[J].Journal of Operational Research Society, 1994,45(2) :309 - 320.
  • 10Ann V A. The principal/agent paradigm: its relevance to various functional fields[J ]. European Journal of Operational Research,1993,70( 1 ) : 83 - 103.

共引文献169

同被引文献352

引证文献29

二级引证文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部