摘要
作为儒学名篇,《礼运》应当是孔子与其弟子子游对话的记录。但是,如果按《史记》所言子游"少孔子四十五岁",则当时子游不到十岁,由此,人们不能不质疑该篇记载的可靠性,对该篇的种种说解也随之产生。其实,《孔子家语》明确记述子游"少孔子三十五岁",只是由于人们对《孔子家语》的价值认识不清,而且《孔子家语》本身版本不一,致使这一问题长期没有得到解决。事实上,当时的子游应当早已年过十五而学于孔子,符合孔门教学的历史实际。
As a famous article of Confucianism, Liyun should be a record of the dialogues between Confucius and his disciple Ziyou. However, according to Historical Records, Ziyou was forty-five years younger than Confucius. If the record was right, Ziyou was only ten years old at that time. Therefore, people doubted the reliability of this article. Then various kinds of understandings came into being. In fact, Kongzi jiayu definitely recorded that Ziyou was thirtyfive years younger than Confucius. Only because people did not have a clear understanding of the value of Kongzi jiayu, in addition there were different editions of Kongzijiayu, this issue had not been solved for a long time Actually, at that time Ziyou was already more than 15 years, which was in accordance with the historical fact of Confucian teaching.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第7期77-81,共5页
Journal of Historical Science
