期刊文献+

双管喉罩与气管插管用于全麻妇科腹腔镜手术的效果比较 被引量:6

Comparison of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway with Endotracheal Intubation in General Anesthesia during Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨双管喉罩与气管插管用于全身麻醉妇科腹腔镜手术的安全性和可行性。方法 2009年1月5月择期妇科腹腔镜手术患者60例,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,随机分为喉罩组(P组)和气管插管组(T组)。记录入室基础值(T0),置罩(管)前(T1),置罩(管)后即刻(T2),置罩(管)后5min(T3),拔除罩(管)即刻(T4),拔除罩(管)后5min(T5)的收缩压(systolic pressure,SBP),舒张压(diastolic pressure,DBP),心率(heart rate,HR)和脉搏血氧饱和度(pulse oxygen saturation,SpO2),喉罩和气管插管控制呼吸时气腹前后不同时段的气道峰压(airway.maximum pressure,Pmax),潮气量(vital volume,VT)和呼气末二氧化碳分压(endtidal CO2,PETCO2)。记录插罩(管)成功率,及相关并发症。结果 T2时T组SBP,DBP和HR显著高于P组(P<0.05),两组术中通气均满意;Pmax,VT和PETCO2组间比较各时点无差异(P>0.05)。气腹后Pmax和PETCO2组内比较均高于气腹前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。置罩(管)成功率组间比较差异无统计学意义,拔罩(管)期及术后24h并发症,喉罩组明显低于气管导管组,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论双管喉罩用于全麻妇科腹腔镜手术通气效果满意,安全可行。 Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in general anesthesia during gynecologic laparoscopic procedure. Methods A total of 60 patients from January to May of 2009, ASA Ⅰ to Ⅱ, undergoing electively gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, were randomly assigned into PLMA group(group P)or endotracheal intubation group (group T). SBP, DBP, HR and SpO_2 were monitored on patients’arrival operating room,before and 5 min after PLMA insertion or endotracheal intubation, 5 min after PLMA or endotracheal extraction airway.Maximum pressure (P_max), vital volume (V_T), end tidal CO_2 (P_ETCO_2) were recorded before and after artificial pneumoperitoneum (APP). Results SBP, DBP and HR of group T were higher after endotracheal intubation than that of group P after PLMA insertion (P0.05). There were no significant differences in P_max, V_T and P_ETCO_2 between group T and group P before and during APP. There were no significant differences in successful rate of PLMA insertion or endotracheal intubation between the two groups,but the complications in group P were lower than that in group T after surgery (P0.05). Conclusion PLMA is safe and efficient in general anesthesia during gynecologic laparoscopic procedures.
作者 赵东芳
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2010年第5期910-912,共3页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 双管喉罩 妇科腹腔镜手术 气管插管 Proseal laryngeal mask airway Gynecologic laparoscopic surgery Endotracheal intubation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1蔡珺,黑子清,池信锦,陈秉学.Proseal喉罩在妇科腹腔镜手术麻醉中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(7):454-457. 被引量:52
  • 2史东平,祝义军,封卫征,闻大翔,杭燕南.食管引流型喉罩在腹腔镜胆囊手术麻醉中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(7):511-513. 被引量:56
  • 3毛鹏,薛富善,李成文,刘鲲鹏,许亚超,刘毅,张国华,孙海涛.食管引流型与标准型喉罩通气道在全身麻醉患者的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(9):643-645. 被引量:63
  • 4周仁龙,杭燕南.第三代喉罩的临床应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(11):880-882. 被引量:162
  • 5Cook TM, Nolan JP. The Pro-Seal laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia,2002,57:288- 289.
  • 6Keller C, Brimacombe J, Lirk P, et al. Failed obstetric tracheal intubation and postoperative respiratory support with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg, 2004,98 : 1467- 1470.
  • 7Nixon T, Brimacombe J, Goldrick P, et al. Airway rescue with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in the intensive care unit. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2003,31:475-476.
  • 8Brimacombe JR, Keller C, Fullekrug B,et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology, 2002,96 : 289-295.
  • 9Keller C, Brimacombe JR,keller K,et al. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth, 1999,82: 286-287.
  • 10Evans NR,Gardner SV,James MF,et al. The ProSeal laryn geal mask:results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth,2002,88:534 -539.

共引文献364

同被引文献37

  • 1马长青,邓乃封.喉罩临床应用的进展[J].医学综述,2006,12(19):1175-1177. 被引量:85
  • 2Brain AI,Verghese C, Strube PJ.The LMA 'Proseal'- a la- ryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent [J ].Br J Anaesth, 2000,84(5 ) : 650-654.
  • 3Nagata T, Kishi Y,Tanigami H, et al.Oral gastric tube-guid- ed insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask is an easy and noninvasive method for less experienced users[J].J Anesth, 2012,26(4):531-535.
  • 4Cook TM, Lee G,Nolan JP.The Proseal laryngeal mask air- way:a review of the literature[J].Can J Anaesth,2005,52 (7) : 739-760.
  • 5Sinha A,Jayaraman L,Punhani D.ProSeal LMA increases safe apnea period in morbidly obese patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia [ J ].Obes Surg, 2013,23 (4) :580-584.
  • 6Teoh PF,Seet E,Macachor J,et al.Accuracy of ProSeal lalcngeal mask airway intracuff pressure estimation using finger palpation technique : a prospective, observational study[J].Anaesth Intensive Care,2012,40(3) :467-471.
  • 7Dyer RA,James MF,Butwick AJ,et al.The Proseal laryn- geal mask airway and elective caesarean section[J ].AnaesthIntensive Care, 2011,39(4) : 760-761.
  • 8Saraswat N,Kumar A,Mishra A,et al.The comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia [ J ].Indian J Anaesth, 2011,55 ( 2 ) : 129-134.
  • 9曲智俊,田鸣,毛文红,董鹏.双管喉罩的临床应用进展[J].山东医药,2008,48(47):114-115. 被引量:14
  • 10赵冬生,黄海斌,段吉安,赵平,王鹏.全麻气管内插管致杓状软骨脱位临床分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2009,17(6):597-597. 被引量:5

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部