摘要
近年来,在我国非物质文化遗产保护中,随着"生产性保护方式"口号的提出,"产业化"保护的理论和实践备受学界、商界(包括旅游业)和政界的关注,赞成和反对两种观点的对立格局业已形成。对于非遗"产业化"保护模式,持赞成立场者,大体是地方的主政者和商界(包括旅游业);持反对立场者,大多数出自人文学界。笔者认为,"非遗"概念下的"传统技艺"类以商业经营的方式获取可持续发展是可行的,但商业化经营不等于产业化。"非遗"保护要从历史错误中吸取教训,更要切忌"一窝蜂"的产业化。从产业化倒退到个体手工业并不是耻辱,而是必然。凡是以牺牲传统技艺及其文化蕴涵为代价的所谓产业化,都是不可取的。
Recently, with the slogan of ＂Producing Protection Mode＂ is putting forward in the protection of China＇ s intangible cultural heritage, the theory and practice of ＂industrialization＂ were concerned by scholastic circles, business circles （include tourism） and political circles, and the approval opinion and disapproval opinion opposite to each other. The assentients are the authorities and the business circles （ include tourism）, and the dissenters are almost come from the humanities circles. The author thinks it is viable for the ＂traditional skills＂ in intangible cul- tural heritage to acquire continued development with the business management mode, but must notice that the business management is not the industrialization. The protection of intangible cultural heritage should draw a lesson from the mistakes in the history, and avoid swarming towards the industrialization. Back to the handicraft industry from industrialization is not a shame, but the necessity. We would rather refuse the industrialization if the protection means to lost traditional skills and culture connotation.
出处
《河南教育学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2010年第4期1-7,共7页
Journal of Henan Institute of Education(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
“非遗”
商业化
产业化
保护模式
争议
intangible cultural heritage
commerce
industrialization
protect style
controversy
