期刊文献+

大学英语网考作文评分变量的功能语言学思考 被引量:1

Reflecting from the Perspective of Functional Grammar on the Variables in Composition Assessment for Internet-based College English Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从功能语言学对语言三大元功能的研究出发,分析了现有国内外二语作文评分过程中存在的问题,探讨了大学英语网考作文评分变量的科学合理性。本文认为作文评判标准须分层次,不同的层次给予不同的分值。作文的优劣既要考虑语言形式的正确性和语言内容的相关性,还有考虑语篇组织的连贯性。作文内容的相关性应该从社会文化这一宽泛的语境去考量。 Based on the three meta-functions in Functional Grammar, this paper analyzes the problems in ESL composition assessment and the rationale for composition assessment of Internet-Based College English Test. It is believed sensible to assess compositions from different levels and give each a different value. The correctness, relatedness as well as cohesion and coherence should be all taken into consideration when compositions are being assessed. The relatedness of a composition should be judged from a larger context of its society and culture.
机构地区 东莞理工学院
出处 《外语电化教学》 CSSCI 2010年第4期10-14,20,共6页 Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education
关键词 功能语言学 大学英语 网考 作文评分 变量 Functional Grammar College English Internet-Based Test Composition Assessment Variables
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Burstein,J. C., Kukich,K., Wolff, S.E. , Lu, C,. & Chodorow, M. Enriching automated scoring using discourse marking[A]. Paper presented at the Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Marking at the annual meeting of the Association, 1998.
  • 2Burstein, J.C. & Marcu, D. , Andrev, S. & Chodoroow M. Towards automated classification if discourse elements in essays[ A]. In Proceedings of the 39^th annual meeting if the Association for Computational Linguistics [ C ]. France, 2001 : 90 - 92.
  • 3Foltz, P. W. , Kintsch, W. & Landauer, t. k. The measurement of texture coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis [ J ]. Discourse Processes, 1998 ( 25 ) : 285 - 308.
  • 4Thompson, G. Introducing Functional Grammar[ M ].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2007.
  • 5Hamp-Lyons, L. Second Language Writing: Assessment Issues [ C ]. In B. Kroll. Second Language Writing: Research Insights for Classroom. NEW York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • 6Jacob, H. S. Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach[M]. Rowley, MA: Newbury House,1981.
  • 7Landauer, T. K., Lanham, D. & Fohz, P. W. The Intelligent Essay Assessor[ A]. In Hearst, K. ( ed. ), The Debate on Automated Essay Scoring IEEE Intelligent Systems [ C ] , September / October,2000.
  • 8Valenti, S. , Neri, F. & Cuechiarelli, A. An overview of current research on automated essay grading [ J ]. Journal of Information Technology Education,2003 ( 2 ) : 319 - 330.
  • 9Weigle, S. C. Assessing Writing [ M ]. Cambridge : CUP, 2002.
  • 10Weir, C.J. Communicative Language Testing [ M ]. NJ : Prentice Hall Regents, 1990.

二级参考文献53

  • 1文秋芳,刘润清.从英语议论文分析大学生抽象思维特点[J].外国语,2006,29(2):49-58. 被引量:278
  • 2程开明.结构方程模型用于顾客满意度测评之实际应用[J].市场研究,2006(5):33-39. 被引量:15
  • 3吴会芹.用现代化手段辅助语言测试[J].外语电化教学,2006(3):49-53. 被引量:5
  • 4Attali, Y. and Burstein, J. Automated essay scoring with Erater V. 2.0 [ A ]. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA), Philadelphia, June 13 - 18, 2004.
  • 5Bachman, L. F. Fundamental considerations in language testing [ M ]. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
  • 6Blok, H. , and de Glopper, K. 1992. Large scale writing assessment[A]. In L. Verhoeven and J. H. A. L. De Jong (eds.). The construct of language proficiency [ C ]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1992 : 101 - 111.
  • 7Burstein, J.C. , Kukich, K. , Wolff, S. , Lu, C. , Chodorow, M., Braden-Harder, L. & Harris, M.D. Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique [ A ]. In The Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Association of Computation[ C], 1998a.
  • 8Burstein, J. C. , Kukieh, K. , Wolff, S. E. , Lu, C. , & Chodorow, M. Enriching automated scoring using discourse marking [ A ]. Paper presented at the Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Marking at the annual meeting of the Association, 1998b.
  • 9Burstein, J. , Kukich, K. , Braden-Harder, L. , Chodorow, M. , Hua, S. & Kaplan, B. Computer analysis of essay content for automatic score prediction: A prototype automated scoring system for GMAT analytical writing assessment[ R]. (Research Report RR-98-15). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1998c.
  • 10Burstein, J. C., & Marcu, D. , Andreyev, S, & Chodorow, M. Towards automatic classification of discourse elements in essays [ A ]. In Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics [ C ], France, 2001:90 - 92.

共引文献264

同被引文献21

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部