摘要
基准时点前如发生特定继受,在当事人恒定主义下,特定继受人不参与诉讼,但判决既判力应扩张及于特定继受人,而在诉讼承继主义下,则由特定继受人替代原当事人(让与人)续行诉讼,判决既判力当然及于特定继受人,不存在既判力主体扩张问题。在我国,应确立诉讼承继主义的模式,并辅以当事人恒定。如特定继受发生在基准时点后,判决既判力应扩张及于特定继受人,但特定继受人可以通过固有抗辩、再审、撤销之诉等途径获得救济。
If particular succession exists before time datum,according to the client eternally-fixed doctrine,particular successors don't participate in action,but he has to comply with Res Judicata;while in the litigation-succeeding doctrine,particular successors take the place of the former part,Res Judicata is binding to the particular successors without the expansion of the subjective scope of Res Judicata.In China,the litigation-succeeding doctrine should be established with the client eternally-fixed doctrine as a supplement.If the particular succession occurs after time datum,Res Judicata is binding to the particular successors,they should be provided with some remedies such as inherent defenses,retrial,the system of challenge the judgment by the third party.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第8期72-82,共11页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
2009年度广州市哲学社会科学发展"十一五"规划课题"和谐社会构建下劳动争议解决机制研究"(项目批准号:09B47)
广东外语外贸大学211项目"诉讼法前沿问题研究"(项目批准号:09FX05)的阶段性成果之一
关键词
既判力
特定继受
程序救济
Res judicata
Particular succession
Procedural relief
