利益相关者满足与企业财务绩效的相关性研究——基于我国家电上市公司面板数据的实证研究被引量：10

A Study on the Relationship between Stakeholders' Satisfaction and the Enterprise's Financial Performance——An Empirical Analysis of Household Electrical Appliance Listed Companies Based on Panel Data Model

原文传递

导出

摘要本文分析了影响利益相关者对企业进行专用性投入进而影响企业财务绩效的因素,指出企业对利益相关者的合理满足是实现企业财务绩效最优化的关键所在;选取代表各利益相关者满足程度和企业财务绩效的指标,采用面板数据模型对我国家电上市公司数据进行实证分析。结果表明:利益相关者满足与企业财务绩效之间存在着显著的相关性。 Based on stakeholder theory,this thesis incorporates contract theory,value chain theory and prospect theory to define stakeholders that influence enterprise＇s financial performance and to analyze factors that affect stakeholders＇ investment and then financial performance. It concludes that how to rationally meet stakeholders＇ interests is the key to optimize enterprise＇s financial performance. An empirical analysis on household electrical appliance companies is conducted based on panel data model. The result shows that stakeholders＇ satisfaction and enterprise＇s financial performance are significantly correlated and that the satisfaction level of different stakeholders is unreasonable. So that,according to value,an enterprise can further enhance its financial performance by rationally adjusting the input-output efficiency of different stakeholders.

作者纪建悦刘艳青袁治

机构地区中国海洋大学经济学院

出处《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第9期71-78,共8页 Finance & Economics

基金山东省自然基金项目"基于利益相关者的企业价值创造机理及评估研究"(批准号Y2008H05)

关键词利益相关者企业财务绩效价值链理论期望理论 Stakeholder Financial Performance Value Chain Theory Prospect Theory Panel Data

分类号 F224.5 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1Freedman M, Jaggi B. An analysis of the impact of corporate pollution disclosures included in annual financial statements on investors' decision [M]. Advances in public interest accounting, Greenwich, 1986.
2Freeman R E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach [M]. Boston, Pitman, 1984.
3Holm,an, W. R., New. J. R., &Singer, D. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsiveness on Shareholder Wealth , 1990. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation and Society Research: Studies in Theory and Measurement (pp. 265-279), Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4Husted B W. A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance [ J]. Business and Society, 2000, (39).
5Jeffrey F. Rayport, John J. Sviokla. Exploiting the Virtual Value Chain [J]. Harvard Business Review, Sep - Dec., 1995.
6Peter Hines. Creating World Class Suppliers: Unlocking Mutual Competitive Advantage [M]. Pitman Publishing Ltd, London, 1994.
7Ruf B M, Muralidhar K R, Brown M, Janney J J, and Paul K. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance an Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective [J]. Journal of Business Ethics (Netherlands), 32: 2001.
8Vroom. P. Yetton. Leadership and Decision Making [M]. University of Pittsburgh Press, 19731.
9Vroom. Work and Motivation, Revised Edition [M]. Jossey- Bass Classics, 1995.
10Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. The Corporate Social Perfonrkance - Financial Performance Link. Paper Presented at the National Meetings of the Academy of Management, Dallas, TX. 1994, 8.