摘要
目的对比制霉菌素与凯妮汀治疗妊娠期念珠菌性阴道炎疗效,评价药物效果。方法通过对我院门诊2004年3月至2008年10月妊娠期念珠菌性道炎的277例患者进行分组治疗,A组患者行制霉菌素治疗,B组行凯妮汀治疗,观察症状改善情况及体征和镜下复查结果,记录并对比分析病情变化和结果。结果凯妮汀治愈84例,占60.87%,制霉菌素治愈70例,占50.36%,统计分析示χ2=10.380,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论凯妮汀治疗妊娠期念珠菌性阴道炎效果优于制霉菌素组,其用药简单,对胎儿影响小,是临床可以选择的治疗药物。
Objective To evaluate clinical efficacy of treating vaginal candidiasiswithvaginal andcandidiasis respectively. Methods A total of 277 patients with vaginal candidiasis at our obstetric outpatient depatrment from March in 2004 to October in 2008 were equally randomized into two groups： A group used mycostatin and B group used canesten. All patients were followed up and diversifications are received carefully. Results There were 84 patients by 50. 36 percent of all cured in B group and 70 patients by 60. 37 percent of all in A group. Statistical analysis outcome（ χ2 = 10. 380,P 0. 05） revealed that the difference between curative effect in 2 groups were statistical significance. Conclusion Canesten with simple usage and no side effect is a better method to cure gestation vaginal candidiasis than costatin.
出处
《中国实用医药》
2010年第24期48-50,共3页
China Practical Medicine
