期刊文献+

再论共同危险行为——以客观关联共同侵权行为理论为视角 被引量:24

Restatement on Damage Caused by Less than All Possible Tortfeasors——with Perspective Based on the Objectively Associated Joint Tortious Acts Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代侵权法的数人侵权行为承担连带责任的理论基础从"主观说"转化为"关联共同说",对共同危险行为的体系定位产生了重大影响。共同危险行为人承担连带责任的基础不再是共同过失,而是客观危险的可责难性。共同危险行为侵权责任构成的因果关系应采"群体危险行为"理论。共同危险行为人应该承担连带责任,并按照客观危险比例进行最终责任分担。证明自己没有实际造成损害的共同危险行为人,应该对其他连带责任人承担补充责任。 The theoretical foundation for multiple tortfeasors to bear joint and several liability in modern tort law changes from "Subjective Theory" to "Associated Joint Theory".This causes the systematic location of damage caused by less than all possible tortfeasors been changed.The foundation of bearing joint and several liability by possible tortfeasors is no longer joint-negligence but the blameworthiness of subjective danger.The causative relation in composition of liability in damage caused by less than all possible tortfeasors may be explained by "Group Dangerous Act Theory".Possible tortfeasors shall bear joint and several liability,their ultimate liability should be distributed based on subjective danger.One may prove that he/she is not the person whole actually caused the harm,and then he shall bear secondary liability.
作者 王竹
机构地区 四川大学法学院
出处 《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期138-146,共9页 Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 2008年度国家社科基金青年项目"不作为侵权责任之研究"(项目批文号:08CFX021)研究成果
关键词 共同危险行为 客观关联共同 群体危险行为 补充责任 Damage Caused by Less than All Possible Tortfeasors Objectively Associated Joint Group Dangerous Act Secondary Liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1王泽鉴.《侵权行为法(第二册)》,台北:自版,2006年.
  • 2杨立新.试论共同危险行为[J].法学研究,1987,9(5):52-55. 被引量:18
  • 3张俊浩.《民法学原理(修订第三版)(下)》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000年.
  • 4Ariel Porat and Alex Stein,Tort Liability Under Uncertainty,Oxford University Press,2001.
  • 5[德]迪特尔·梅迪库斯.《德国债法总论》,杜景林,卢谌译,北京:法律出版社,2003年.
  • 6James A.Henderson,Jr.,Richard N.Pearson,Douglas A.Kysar and John A.Siliciano,The Torts Process (7th),Aspen Publishers,2007.
  • 7黄立.《民法债编总论(修正第三版)》,台北:自版,2006年.
  • 8杨立新.《侵权法论(第三版)》.北京:人民法院出版社,2005年,第518页.
  • 9W van Gerven,P Larouche,J Lever,Cases,Materials and Text on National,Supranational and International Tort Law,Hart Publishing,2000.
  • 10[德]克雷斯蒂安·冯·巴尔.《 欧洲比较侵权行为法(上卷)》,张新宝译,北京:法律出版社,2001年.

二级参考文献34

  • 1杨立新,马桦.性骚扰行为的侵权责任形态分析[J].法学杂志,2005,26(6):72-74. 被引量:22
  • 2程啸.机动车损害赔偿责任主体研究[J].法学研究,2006,28(4):127-140. 被引量:65
  • 3杨立新.《侵权法论》第3版.人民法院出版社,2005年版,第177页.
  • 4王竹.《论法定型不真正连带责任及其在严格责任领域的扩展适用》,《人大法律评论》2009年卷(总第7辑),法律出版社2009年版.
  • 5何勤华,李秀清,陈颐编.《新中国民法典草案总览》上册,法律出版社200B年版,第226页、第243页.
  • 6张新宝,唐青林.《共同侵权责任十论一以责任承担为中心重塑共同侵权理论》,载黄松有主编:《民事审判指导与参考》(总第18集),法律出版社2004年版.
  • 7Dan B. Dobbs, Paul T. Hayden, The Law of Torts 2008 Supplement, Volume 2, Thomson West, 2008, p.189.
  • 8ALl, Restatement of the Law, Third, Torts: Apportionment of Liability, 2000, § 1 Issues and Causes of Action Addressed by I This Restatement, Reporters Notes: Comment c. Special Issues Involving Intentional Torts.
  • 9ALI, Restatement of the Law, Third, Torts: Apportionment of Liability, 2000, § 23 Contribution,Comment 1. Intentional Torts.
  • 10F. Dessemontet and T. Ansay(ed. ), Introduction to Swiss Law ,3rd edition, Kluwer Law International, 2004, p.161.

共引文献111

引证文献24

二级引证文献176

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部