摘要
美国学术期刊评价实践中主要存在着商业化导向,收录期刊在地域、语种方面的偏见,收录期刊学科分布不均,收录人文社会科学期刊时存在着意识形态偏见等问题。中国的学术期刊评价实践中主要存在着功利性的导向使期刊评价成为科研管理与绩效评价的工具之一,过于看重文献计量的定量评价方法,评价指标的数据客观性差,在发展性与国际化方面不足,引文不规范和统一引文数据库的缺乏直接影响评价数据的准确性,综合性期刊的学科归类不准确,评价的时滞与监督机制的缺乏,中国人文社会科学类期刊评价的本土化等问题。期刊评价或排序的价值,在以内容为单元的知识发现背景下文本挖掘技术的应用,以社会需求为导向的期刊文献内容相关性评价,从对一级学科的评价转向二级甚至三级学科的评价,合理的评价机制与和谐的学术氛围等是未来学术期刊评价深入并持续开展的前提。
Problems of commercial-oriented, prejudice towards region and language, imbalance in disciplines, ideological prejudice towards social and humanities journals exist in American academic journal evaluation. Utilitarian makes Chinese journal evaluation the tool of scientific management and performance evaluation. Problems of over-emphasis on bibliometric quantitative evaluation, low objectivity and lack of devleopment and internation of the evaluation data, standardless citation and lack of citation database directly result in the accuracy of the data, inaccuracy of discipline classification of the university journals, the evaluation lag and surveillance mechanism and localization of Chinese science and humanities journals evaluation exist in China＇ s academic journal evaluation. In the future, evaluation value, the application of text digging in journal evaluation, content relevance evaluation guided by social demand, transition from discipline evaluation to physics speciality evaluation, reasonable evaluation mechanism and harmonious academic atmosphere will be the evaluation tendency.
出处
《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期73-81,共9页
Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金
湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目"中外学术期刊评价比较研究"(2009b338)
关键词
学术期刊
期刊评价
主要问题
美国
中国
academic journals
journal evaluation
main problem
USA
China
