我国技术创新影响因素的动态分析——基于SVAR模型的实证研究被引量：6

Dynamic Analysis of the Factors Influencing Technological Innovation in China——Empirical Research Based on SVAR Model

下载PDF

导出

摘要运用SVAR技术建立SVAR⑶模型,探讨我国技术创新、R&D、科研人员和"市场换技术"制度之间的短期与长期关系。研究发现:除了R&D、科研人员之外,"FDI制度"是影响我国技术创新的另一个重要资源。短期内"FDI制度"通过市场替代机制改变了R&D、科研人员投入的激励机制,导致部分内资企业偏好引进技术的短期行为,抑制了自主创新,但长期内"FDI制度"带来的外资竞争和技术外溢效应促进了技术创新;技术创新与R&D两者互为因果、自我加强,科研成果对科研人员的反向激励和拉动作用不明显,"FDI制度"促进了R&D投入;技术创新的规模报酬递减,R&D是技术创新持续增长的主要保障。 This article applies SVAR technology to build a SVAR（3） model, discussing the short-term and long- term relations between technological innovation, R＆D, researchers and system of ＂Exchange Market for Technology＂. Studies show that： first, other than R＆D and researchers, system of ＂Exchange Market for Technology＂ is another important resource influencing technological innovation in China. In the short term, the system of ＂Exchange Market for Technology＂ changes the incentive mechanism of technological innovation investment through market substitution mechanism, which leads to part of domestic enterprises preference to introduce technology and suppress independent innovation. But in the long term, the technology spillover effects of FDI that the system brings about promote technological innovation. Second, there is a reciprocal causation and interactive relationship between technological innovation and R＆D, but reverse incentive and pulling function of the achievements in scientific research for the researcher growth is not obvious. System of ＂Exchange Market for Technology＂ accelerates R＆D investment. Third, technological innovation exhibits diminishing returns to scale, and R＆D is the major guarantee of the sustainable technological innovation growth.

作者余秀江胡冬生何新闻王宣喻

机构地区华南农业大学经济管理学院

出处《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第8期11-16,20,共7页 Soft Science

基金广东省软科学项目(2006B70105016) 广东省软科学重点项目(2007B080202006)

关键词技术创新 R&D FDI 市场换技术 SVAR模型 technological innovation R＆D FDI exchange market for technology SVAR model

分类号 F124.3 [经济管理—世界经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1MacDougall G D A. The Benefits and Costs of Private Investment from Abroad : A Theoretical Approach [ J ]. Economic Record, 1960 (36) :13 -35.
2Liu Xiaming, Pamela Siler. Productivity Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from UK Industry Level Panel Data [ J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2000 ( 31 ) :407 - 425.
3Ayyagafi M, R Kosova. Does FDI Facilitate Domestic Entrepreneurship? Evidence from the Czech Republic [ D ]. George Washington University Working Paper,2007.
4Keller, Wolfgang, Yeaple S. Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth : Firm - Level Evidence From the United States[D]. University of Texas,Austin,Manuscript,2004.
5Konings J. The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Domestic Firms: Evidence from Firm Level Panel Data in Emerging Economies[J]. Economics of Transition,2001 (9) :619 -633.
6Harris R, Robinson C. Productivity Impacts and Spillovers from Foreign Ownership in the United Kingdom[J-. National Institute Economic Review, 2004 ( 187 ) : 58 - 75.
7Buckley J. Inward Foreign Direct Investment and Host Country Productivity: Evidence from the Chinese Electronics Industry [ M]. Transnational Corporations, forthcoming ,2005.
8Sanna - Randaccio, Francesca. The Impact of Foreign Direct Invest- ment on Home and Host Countries with Endogenous R&D[J]. Review of International Economics, 2002(10) :278 -298.
9Meyer K E. Perspectives on Multinational Enterprises in Emerging Economies[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2004,35 (4) :259-276.
10Kugler M. The Sectoral Diffusion of Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment [ M ]. Mimeo, University of Southampton, August, 2001.