摘要
在如何看待中国传统文化的问题上,一直存在"挺派"、"抑派"与"庸派"三种观点。但它们所共同采用的整体抽象定性法并不可靠,所以需用新的方法做新的尝试。这就是在文化工具论的视域下,以现代文化和外族文化为参照,对中国传统文化所包含的语言、宗教、科学、技术、哲学、艺术、规则等七种构成作为不同功能的工具逐一进行评估,而后再形成对中国传统文化的总体评价。用这一方法得到的结论是:在中国传统文化中,只有传统语言和传统宗教是属于能按原样沿用至今而不失效力的部分;而传统哲学和传统艺术虽基本上能原样沿用至今,但其对中华民族的报答力已不如当初创造时那么大;至于传统科学技术与传统规则,则属在整体上已呈落后之势的东西。因此,中国传统文化从总体上看具有优势的东西与直接可为今天所用的东西只是一部分,而其世界影响力也主要体现为对其他民族的吸引而非同化。
In how to treat the issue of Chinese traditional culture,there are always three viewpoints： supporting faction,suppressing faction and neutral faction.But the common overall Abstract qualitative method which they adopt is not reliable,so we need new ways to try something new.That is,in the perspective of culture tool theory,with reference to the modern culture and alien culture,take seven compositions of Chinese traditional culture： the language,religion,science,technology,philosophy,art and rules,as different functional tools to assess them individually,and then form a general evaluation of Chinese traditional culture.Thus we can conclude that,in Chinese traditional culture,only the traditional language and religions are able to stand still in use today as their original ways and not losing effectiveness;although the traditional philosophy and arts are basically able to stand still in use today,but the reward power to Chinese nation is not so much as they had been created;as for the traditional scientific techniques and rules belong to things which are already backward on the overall trend.Therefore,in general the Chinese traditional culture can not adapt to the contemporary social reality and meet the needs of modern people,while its global influence,is mainly embodied in the attraction to other nations rather than assimilation.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第8期17-25,共9页
Academic Monthly
关键词
中国传统文化
文化工具论
整体抽象定性法
当代价值
世界影响力
Chinese traditional culture
theory of cultural tool
the overall Abstract qualitative method
contemporary value
world influence
