期刊文献+

影响婴幼儿头颅低剂量CT图像质量的客观因素的研究 被引量:14

Objective factors affecting the image quality of low-dose cranial CT of infant
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨使用不同管电流时间积行婴幼儿头颅CT扫描时,影响图像质量的客观因素.方法 随机将90例行头颅CT扫描的婴幼儿分成3组,测量每个婴幼儿的头颅最大前后径(MAPD),选择性研究3个参考层面(幕下小脑、幕上基底节和半卵圆中心层面),每个组只研究一个层面,每个层面用150、100及80 mAs管电流时间积进行扫描,对各层面图像进行主观质量评分,并测量其客观量化噪声值.结果 90例婴幼儿平均MAPD为(148.0±17.4)mm.在小脑层面,主观图像质量得分较其他2个层面低.管电流时间积为150、100和80 mAs时,小脑层面的量化噪声值分别较幕上层面高6.3%、9.4%和22.9%.MAPD与图像主观质量评分及客观量化噪声值之间均呈显著性相关.结论 在婴幼儿头颅CT扫描时,小脑层面固有高噪声及MAPD是影响婴幼儿头颅低剂量CT扫描图像质量的客观因素. Objective To investigate the objective factors that affect the image quality of infant cranial CT using different mAs. Materials and Methods Ninety infants were divided into three groups randomly. The maximum anteroposterior diameter (MAPD) of skull of each infant was measured. Three reference levels, cerebellar, basal ganglia and centrum semiovale levels were selected respectively. Only one level was studied in each group and scanned with 150, 100 and 80 mAs. The subjective quality grade and the objective noise of all images were recorded and analysed statistically. Result The average MAPD of ninety patients was (148.0 ± 17.4)mm. On the cerebellar level, the subjective quality grade was lower than the other two levels, which were 6.3% , 9.4% and 22.9% respectively when mAs were 150, 100 and 80 mAs. Both quality grade of image and objective noise were significantly correlated with MAPD.Conclusion The inherent high noise of cerebellar level and MAPD were the objective factors that affect the image quality of low-dose cranial CT of infant.
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期472-474,共3页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
基金 深圳市科技局科技计划基金资助项目(200304193)
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 辐射剂量 婴幼儿 Tomography, X-ray computed Radiation dose Head Infant
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Shrimpton PC,Jones DG,Hillier MC,et al.Survey of CT practice in the UK.Part2:dosimetric aspects,NRPB-R249.London:HMSO,1991:1-121.
  • 2吴爱琴,郑文龙,许崇永,程建敏,陈宇,陈廷港.低剂量CT扫描在患儿颅脑检查中的防护价值[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2007,27(5):508-509. 被引量:4
  • 3Wong ET,Yu SK,Lai M,et al.MAPD-an objective way to select mAs for paediatric brain CT.Br J Radiol,2001,74(886):932-937.
  • 4McCrohan JL,Patterson JF,Gagne RM,et al.Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for250 CT systems.Radiology,1987,163(1):263-268.
  • 5Takahashi M,Maguire WM,Ashtari M,et al.Low-dose spiral computed tomography of the thorax:comparison with the standard-dose technique.Invest Radiol,1998,33(2):68-73.
  • 6Kalra MK,Prasad S,Saini S,et al.Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT:effect on image quality.Am J Roentgenol,2002,179(5):1101-1106.
  • 7Gündogdu S,Mahmutyazicioglu K,Ozdemir H,et al.Assessrnent of image quality of a standard and three dose-reducing protocols in adult cranial CT.Eur Radiol,2005,15(9):1959-1968.

二级参考文献4

共引文献3

同被引文献87

引证文献14

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部