期刊文献+

关颅期用药对颅脑手术患者苏醒质量的影响 被引量:1

Effect of different anesthetics on awakening quality in patients undergoing craniotomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的雷米芬太尼用于颅脑显微手术关颅期对苏醒质量影响。方法 45例颅脑手术患者均分为三组,在关硬脑膜时分别应用雷米芬太尼(R组)、丙泊酚(P组)或异氟醚(I组)处理。三组均在术毕前2min停药,记录围苏醒期循环和Ramsay评分。结果 P、I组关颅期均有明显HR增快和MAP升高(P<0.05);但R组则较平稳。R组在拔管时HR明显慢于P组和I组[(84.7±10.5)次/分vs.(95.1±10.8)次/分和(96.3±10.9)次/分](P<0.05),MAP也明显低于P组和I组[(79.8±4.1)mmHgvs.(109.2±5.2)mmHg和(103.3±5.8)mmHg](P<0.05)。拔管后10min,R组和P组的Ramsay评分显著低于I组。结论在关颅期靶控输注雷米芬太尼或丙泊酚均能早期苏醒拔管,雷米芬太尼更有利于抑制手术刺激和围拔管期的高血压,提高苏醒质量。 Objective To investigate the effects of three anesthetics on early postoperative hypertension,Ramsay scores in patients undergoing craniotomy.Methods Forty-five patients under propofol-fentanyl-isoflurane anesthesia were divided to three groups with 15 cases each.At the beginning of dural closure,the patients were treated with TCI remifentanil (group R),propofol(group P) or isoflurane inhalation(group I) until skin closure.MAP,HR and Ramsay score were recorded during recovery period.Results MAP and HR were increased in groups of P and I,which were stable in group R.During extubation,HR was lower in group R than that in groups of P and I [(84.7±10.5) vs.(95.1±10.8) and (96.3±10.9) beats/min](P0.05),so did MAP [(79.8±4.1) vs.(109.2±5.2) and (103.3±5.8) mm Hg](P0.05).Ramsay score at 10 min after extubation was lower in group R than that in groups of P and I.Conclusion TCI remifentanil during dural closure and recovery from general anesthesia is better than propofol or isoflurene for stablizing circulation and improving awakening quality in neurosurgical patients.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第16期1886-1887,共2页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 雷米芬太尼 颅脑手术 苏醒 Remifentanil Craniotomy Awakening
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Bilotta F, Caramia R, Paoloni FP, et al. Early postoperative cognitive recovery after remifentanil-propofol or sufentanilpropofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy: a randomized trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2007,24(2) : 122-127.
  • 2Balakrishnan G, Raudzens P, Samra SK, et al. A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesion[J]. Anesth Analg, 2000, 91 (1), 163- 169.
  • 3邢燕,王保国,米卫东,安健雄,郭曲练,黄雄庆.神经外科手术患者应用瑞芬太尼的多中心临床研究[J].中华医学杂志,2008,88(17):1163-1167. 被引量:1

二级参考文献11

  • 1廖琴,陈道瑾,王明安,欧阳文.瑞芬太尼与芬太尼在老年患者全身麻醉中应用的比较[J].实用预防医学,2005,12(2):313-314. 被引量:6
  • 2邢燕,王保国,孙立,时文株,安建雄,范婷.瑞芬太尼在神经外科手术麻醉中靶浓度的研究[J].首都医科大学学报,2006,27(5):581-585. 被引量:6
  • 3Balakrishnan G, Raudzens PA. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesion. Anesth Analg, 2000, 91: 163-169.
  • 4David R, Harry JM. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil as a supplement to nitrous oxide anesthesia for elective abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology, 1998, 89 : 869-877.
  • 5Vuyk J, Mertens MJ, Olofsen E, et al. Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection. Anesthesiology, 1997, 87 : 1549-1562.
  • 6Wilhelm W, Schlaich N, Harrer J, et al. Recovery and neurological examination after remifentanil-desflurane of fentanyl- desflurane anaesthesia for carolid artery surgery. Br J Anaesth, 2001, 86: 44-49.
  • 7Fleisher LA, Hogue S, Colopy M, et al. Dose functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl- based anesthesia? J Clin Anesth, 2001, 13:401-406.
  • 8Mertens MJ, Olofsen E, Engbers FH, et al. Propofol reduces perioperative remifentanil requirements in a synergistic manner: response surface modeling of perioperative remifentanil-propofol interactions. Anesthesiology, 2003, 99: 347-352.
  • 9Glass PSA, Shafer SL, Reves JG. Intravenous drug delivery system // Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia. 5th ed. California: Churchill livingstone. 2001 : 377-411.
  • 10张晓丽,杜冬萍,徐惠芳,周全红,周瑾.静脉和硬膜外PCA用于术后镇痛的效果评估[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1998,18(4):251-253. 被引量:167

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部