期刊文献+

股骨近端抗旋髓内钉在股骨转子周围骨折中的应用 被引量:11

Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femur nail antirotation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 总结股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗转子周围骨折的临床经验,探讨其临床疗效.方法 2006年3月-2008年9月使用PFNA治疗136例转子周围骨折患者,骨折均为闭合型.手术使用骨科牵引床、C形臂影像增强器,采用闭合复位或有限切开复位、锁定技术.结果 136例经10~18个月随访,平均14.5个月,所有患者均获得骨性愈合.根据Harris髋关节评分,129例(94.9%)为优良.结论 PFNA治疗股骨转子周围骨折手术创伤小、并发症少、固定更稳定,是股骨转子周围骨折理想的内固定物. Objective To summarize the experiences in treatment of intertochanteric fractures with proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA). Methods A retrospective study was done on 136 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA from March 2006 to September 2008. Postoperative reduction quality, long-term radiographic results and function of hip were evaluated separately. All the patients had closed fractures. The operation involved orthopedic traction bed, C-arm image intensifier,closed reduction or limited open reduction and locking technique. Results All patients were followed up for 10-18 months (average 14.5 months), which showed fracture healing in all patients. According to Harris criterion, the function of the hip joint obtained excellence in 129 patients ( 94.9% ). Conclusion PFNA has advantages of simple procedure, minimal invasion, firm fixation and early functional exercises and is an effective method for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第8期709-712,共4页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
关键词 股骨 髋骨折 骨折固定术 股骨近端抗旋髓内钉 Femur Hip fractures Fracture fixation,internal Proximal femur nail antirotation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Baumgaertner MR,Chrostowski JH,Levy RN.Intertrochanteric hip fracture//Bruce D.Browner,ed.Skeletal Trauma.2nd ed.Philadelphia:WB Saunders,1998:1833-1881.
  • 2Curtis M J,Jinnah RH,Wilson V,et al.Proximal femoral fractures:a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation.Injury,1994,25(3):99 -104.
  • 3Bridle SH,Patel AD,Bircher M,et al.Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur:a randomized prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw.J Bone Joint Surg (Br),1991,73(2):330 -334.
  • 4Butt MS,Krikler SJ,Nafie S,et al.Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail:a prospective,randomized,controlled study.Injury,1995,26(9):615-618.
  • 5Kukla C,Pichl W,Prokesch R,et al.Femoral neck fracture after removal of the standard gamma interlocking nail:a cadaveric study to determine factors influencing the biomechanical properties of the proximal femur.J Biomech,2001,34(12):1519-1526.
  • 6Simmermacher RK,Bosch AM,Van der Werken C.The AO/ASIFproximal femoral nail (PFN):a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures.Injury,1999,30(5):327 -332.
  • 7Sommers MB,Roth C,Hall H,et al.A laboratory model to evaluate cutout resistance of implants for pertrochanteric fracture fixation.J Orthop Trauma,2004,18(6):361 -368.
  • 8Windolf J,Hollander DA,Hakimi M,et al.Pitfalls and complications in the use of the proximal femoral nail.Langenbeck' s Arch Surg,2005,390(1):59 -65.
  • 9Menezes DF,Gamulin A,Noesberger B.Is the proximal femoral nail a suitable implant for treatment of all trochanteric fractures?Clin Orthop Relat Res,2005,(439):221-227.
  • 10Kish B,Regev A,Goren D,et al.Complications with the use of proximal femoral nail (PFN).J Bone Joint Surg (Br),2005,87 -B (Supplement Ⅲ):376.

同被引文献116

引证文献11

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部