保障性住房建设方式及选址问题研究被引量：17

The Study of Construction Form and Site Selection of Security Housing

下载PDF

导出

摘要当前,保障性住房多采用独立集中建设方式,而且大多选址在城市边缘区域,这导致我国城市出现居住空间分异,同时低收入居住区远离市区,这样极易造成社会劣势群体的空间集中并产生严重的社会隔离。因此保障性住房建设方式及选址是当前保障性住房建设必须重视的两个问题。文章对这两个问题进行了分析,并对今后的保障性住房建设方式及选址提出了如下改进建议:一是加大保障性住房开发配建比例,以形成混合居住模式;二是选址应邻近大运量城市公交系统,以TOD发展模式为主;三是部分项目选址应在老城区;四是借鉴香港经验,应该在有发展潜力的新城选址。 Independent centralized construction form is mostly used in the construction of security housing. Meanwhile, the sites of security housing are mostly seIected around urban edge. All of this results in urban residential segregation and low income housing areas＇ departing from city area. The present situation easily brings about spatial concentration of social inferior group and serious social segregation. So construction form and site selection are two important problems in the present construction of security housing. This article analyzes these two problems and proposes suggestions, which include enlarge the areas of the construction of security housing for living together for different people,selecting in the city area and developing the new areas.

作者吕艳扈文秀

机构地区西安理工大学经济与管理学院西北大学经济管理学院

出处《西安财经学院学报》 2010年第5期35-39,共5页 Journal of Xi’an University of Finance & Economics

基金陕西省科技厅软科学项目(2008KR97)

关键词保障性住房居住空间分异住房选址配套设施 security housing residential segregation site selection infrastructure

分类号 F293.3 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1单文慧.不同收入阶层混合居住模式——价值评判与实施策略[J].城市规划,2001,25(2):26-29. 被引量：98
2孙斌栋,刘学良.美国混合居住政策及其效应的研究述评--兼论对我国经济适用房和廉租房规划建设的启示[J].城市规划学刊,2009(1):90-97. 被引量：37
3[加]简·雅各布斯.美国大城市的生与死[M].金衡山,译.南京:译林出版社,2005.
4MARK JOSEPH, ROBERT CHASKIN, HENRY WEBBER. The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development [ J ]. Urban Affairs Review, 2007,42(3) : 369 - 409.
5田野,栗德祥,毕向阳.不同阶层居民混合居住及其可行性分析[J].建筑学报,2006(4):36-39. 被引量：46

二级参考文献46

1SAP.JISSIAN W. The idea of social mix in town planning: an historical review [J], Urban Studies, 1976, 13(3):231-246.
2LUSIGNAN P R. Public housing in the United States, 1933- 1949 [J]. Cultural Resource Management,2002,25(1):36-37.
3SCHILL M H. Distressed public housing: where do we go from here [J]? The University of Chicago Law Review, 1993, 60(2): 497-554.
4VALE L J. The future of planned poverty: redeveloping America's most distressed public housing projects [J]. Neth. J. of housing and the Building Environment, 1999, 14(1):13-31.
5ATKINSON R. Neighbourhoods and the impacts of social mix: crime, tenure diversification and assisted mobility [OL], 2005. http: / /www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/cnrpaperspdf/cnr29pap.pdf
6WILSON WJ.真正的穷人[M].成伯清,鲍磊,张戌凡,译.上海人民出版社.2007
7WILSON W J. Another look at the truly disadvantaged[J].Political Science Quarterly, 1991, 106(4):639- 656.
8FEITOSA F F, WISSMANN A. Social-mix policy approaches to urban segregation in Europe and the United States [M]. Zentrum for Entwicklungschung Center for Development Research Universitat Bonn, 2006.
9RANKIN B H., QUANE J M. Neighborhood poverty, and the social isolation of inner-city African American families [J]. Social Forces, 2000, 79(1):139-164.
10CRANE J. The epidemic theory, of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing [J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1991, 96(5):1226-1259.