期刊文献+

半量瑞替普酶和尿激酶溶栓治疗75岁以上老年急性心肌梗死疗效比较 被引量:8

原文传递
导出
出处 《心脏杂志》 CAS 2010年第5期796-796,F0003,共2页 Chinese Heart Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献7

共引文献251

同被引文献41

  • 1李泽恩.不同剂量参附注射液治疗急性心肌梗死(ST段上抬型)并发左心衰的临床研究[J].新中医,2006,38(6):19-20. 被引量:9
  • 2陈春红,尹博英,肖暖,潘焕军,王占启,邸丕凡,陈彦霞,李晓红.瑞替普酶联合低分子肝素治疗急性心肌梗死28例临床观察[J].中国医药,2006,1(5):271-272. 被引量:8
  • 3急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1321
  • 4姚光辉,杨荣平.急性心肌梗死溶栓药物疗效的循证医学评价[J].心血管病学进展,2007,28(1):56-59. 被引量:28
  • 5中华心血管病杂志编委会.急性心肌梗死溶栓方法参考方案[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,(7):20-20.
  • 6Smalling RW, Bode C, Kalbfleish J, et al. More rapid, complete, and stable coronary thrombolysis with bolus administration of reteplase compared with alteplase infusion in acute myocardial infarction: RAPID Investigators [J]. Circulation, 1995,91 ( 11 ) :2725 - 2732.
  • 7Bode C,Smaling RW,Berg G,et al. Randomisod comparison of coronary thrombolysis achieved with doublebolus retoplase( recombinant plasminogen activator ) and front-loaded, accelerated altoplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator)in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The RAPID Ⅱ Investigators[J]. Circulation, 1996,94(5) :891 -898.
  • 8Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO,et al. Braunwald'a Heart Disease [M]. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunder,2005 : 1178 - 1180.
  • 9Anon. Randomised, double-blind comparison of reteplase double-bolus administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (INJECT) :trial to investigate equivalence. International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics[J]. Lancet, 1995,346 ( 8971 ) : 329 - 336.
  • 10Aasa M, Henriksson M, Dellborg M, et al. Cost and health outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolysis in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Results of the Swedish Early Decision reperfusion Study (SWEDES) trial. Am Heart J, 2010,160(2) : 322-328.

引证文献8

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部