期刊文献+

兰州市居民幸福感研究 被引量:15

Research on residents’happiness in Lanzhou
原文传递
导出
摘要 以微观个体的幸福感为测评对象,通过发放调查问卷,对受访者反馈的信息进行统计处理。首先借助列联表检验法对影响兰州市居民幸福感的因素进行了分析,然后采用Ordered Logistic模型对与幸福感有相关关系的变量进行组群差异分析。结果表明:兰州市居民幸福感与性别、教育程度、健康状况、职业稳定、家庭关系等因素显著相关。尽管婚姻状况与居民幸福感之间没有表现出相关关系,但婚姻异常(包括丧偶、分居和离婚)对居民幸福感具有突出的负面影响。最后,对居民幸福感与年龄、收入和婚姻关系做了进一步分析,结论为:1)居民幸福感与年龄呈"U"型关系,U型最低点在42岁;2)居民幸福感随收入的增加呈边际递减趋势,收入阈值为27500元;3)婚姻与幸福的关系较为复杂。表现为离婚状态下的居民幸福感最低;已婚男性的幸福感大于未婚男性,而已婚女性的幸福感不及未婚女性。 In order to study the residents' happiness,we collected a mass of individual's information provided by questionnaire in Lanzhou.Based on cross table and ordered Logistic model,the influencing factors and group difference of residents' happiness are analyzed.Results show that there is significant relation between residents' happiness and some factors,such as sex,education level,health,occupation stability and family harmony,etc.Although marriage state has no obvious impact on residents' happiness,the negative effect caused by marriage abnormity is prominent-divorce for example.Finally we further analyzed the relation between residents' happiness and age,income and marriage,and some conclusion were attained.The relation of residents' happiness and sex presents "U" curve that arrives at the lowest point at the age of 42.Along with the increase of income,residents' happiness shows marginal decreasing tendency,and the threshold value is 27500 RMB.But the relation residents' happiness and marriage is very complex.Residents' happiness comes to the lowest in the divorce state.The married masculine's happiness is greater than the unmarried ones',but it is opposite as far as the feminine.
出处 《干旱区资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期36-43,共8页 Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基金 甘肃省教育厅科研项目(0701-24) 西北师范大学自然地理学省级重点学科资助
关键词 幸福感 影响因素 组群差异 兰州 happiness influencing factors group difference Lanzhou
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Easterlin R A. Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? In: David, P A, Reder, M W (Eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth[ M]. Academic Press, New York. 1974.
  • 2Costanza R, Fisher B, Ali S, et al. Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well - being[ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2007 (61) : 267 -276.
  • 3Mookerjee R, Beron K. Gender, religion and happiness[J]. The Journal of Socio- Economics, 2005 (34) : 674 -685.
  • 4Gowdy J. Toward a new welfare economics for sustainability[ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2005 (53) : 211 -222.
  • 5Alesina A, Tella R D, MacCulloch R. Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different[ J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2004 (88) : 2009 -2042.
  • 6Veenhoven R, Hagerty M. Rising happiness in nations 1946 -2004 [ J ]. Social Indicators Research, 2006, 79:421 -436.
  • 7Ferrer - i - Carbonell A. Income and well - being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect[ J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2005 (89) : 997 -1019.
  • 8Easterlin R A. Life cycle welfare: evidence and conjecture[J]. Journal of Socio- Economics, 2001, 30:31 -61.
  • 9Easterlin R A. Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all [ J ]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1995 (27) : 35 -47.
  • 10Graham C, Eggers A, Sukhtankar S. Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia[ J ]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2004 (55) : 319 -342.

二级参考文献70

共引文献295

同被引文献237

引证文献15

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部