期刊文献+

民机驾驶舱工效学综合评价方法研究及应用 被引量:3

Study on Comprehensive Evaluation of Cockpit Ergonomics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 飞机驾驶舱工效学综合评价是驾驶舱研制中一个极其重要的问题,以往在驾驶舱的研制过程中往往为其工程质量提出种种衡量标准而忽视工效学的综合评价,导致设计出的驾驶舱存在不少工效学方面的问题。为此,结合民机驾驶舱工效学的实际情况,本文提出一种将改进专家打分法、三标度层次分析法和模糊综合评判法集成的综合评价体系,给出了合适、可操作的评价指标和评价方法,能指导驾驶舱的工效学评价。该体系考虑了工效学评价的模糊性,实现了征求和提炼专家群体的意见,对飞机驾驶舱工效学进行了定量地综合评价,为比较相似设计方案的优劣提供了理论基础和方法。应用此方法,结合研究项目,对某民机驾驶舱尺寸设计的工效学进行了评价,证明了该方法的有效性。 Comprehensive evaluation of cockpit ergonomics plays key role in the new-type cockpit development.During the development of aircraft cockpits in the past some judge standards were proposed in order to ensure design quality without allowing for ergonomics evaluation.This leaded to several problems conflicting with ergonomics in the cockpits design.In terms of these problems,a novel integrated approach was proposed by combining Modified Delphi,Modified Analytical Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation,with an appropriate and operational evaluation index and method to direct the cockpit ergonomics evaluation.It is characterized with taking into account the fuzzy of ergonomics evaluation,soliciting and synthesizing experts’ judgment.Therefore this approach can made up the comprehensive evaluation of cockpit ergonomics objectively and quantitatively.This provided a theoretical basis and a practical method in order to compare different design schemes.Utilizing the method,the geometry ergonomics of an aircraft cockpit was evaluated roundly,and the results proved the validity of this method.
出处 《飞机设计》 2010年第4期36-40,共5页 Aircraft Design
基金 中国民用航空科技项目(MHRD0722) 江苏省六大才高峰项目(07-D-012)资助
关键词 驾驶舱工效学 评价指标 权重系数 模糊综合评判 cockpit ergonomics evaluation index weight factors fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Leo F H,Wayne E S.A development in cockpit geometry evaluation[R].The Boeing Company,Seattle,Washington,1969.
  • 2王辉,武国城,刘保钢,贺青.进一步加强航空工效学的理论与应用研究[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,1998,9(3):180-183. 被引量:11
  • 3李银霞,袁修干.飞机座舱人机几何适配性评价技术研究进展[J].人类工效学,2003,9(2):29-32. 被引量:8
  • 4李银霞,袁修干,杨锋.飞机座舱工效多级模糊评价研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2003,13(3):50-53. 被引量:12
  • 5XIAO Jian guo,Douglas D.A Delphi evaluation of the factors influencing length of stay in Australian hospitals[J].International Journal of Health Planning and Management,1997,(12):207-218.
  • 6MIL-STD-203G1991,Aircrew station controls and displays:location,Arrangement and actuation of,for fixed wing aircraft[S].MIL-STD-1472F 1999,Human engineering[S].MIL-HDBK-759C1995,Human engineering design guidelines[S].GJB 1062-911991,Gernal requirements of human engineering design for military visual displays[S].GJB / Z201-2001,Human engineering design manual for military equipment and facilities[S].
  • 7Osborne J,Collins S,Ratcliffe M,et al.What ideas-about-science school be taught in school science? A delphi study of the expert community[J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2003,40(7):692-720.
  • 8陈伟.正确认识层次分析法(AHP法)[J].人类工效学,2000,6(2):32-35. 被引量:63
  • 9李银霞 袁修干 杨锋.飞机座舱设计工效学综合评价系统的设计及实现[J].计算机应用研究,2004,21(9):264-265.
  • 10扎德L A.模糊集合、语言变量集模糊逻辑[M].陈国权译.北京:科学出版社,1984.

二级参考文献28

  • 1孙善麟.用于工效学领域的虚拟人体模型研究概述[J].人类工效学,1998,4(1):52-57. 被引量:15
  • 2孙滨生.现代战斗机座舱布局[M].北京:航空工业出版社,1989..
  • 3沈之鑫.计算机辅助人-机工程系统模拟的研究[M].北京:北京航空航天大学,1988..
  • 4沈翔.计算机辅助人机工程系统软件的开发-PANDA—MMES软件的移植与改进[M].北京:北京航空航天大学,1991..
  • 5王威.人机工程系统研究工具MMS-PANDA-SGI开发[M].北京:北京航空航天大学,1992..
  • 6沈翔.人机系统中人体运动仿真及其应用[M].北京:北京航空航天大学,1995..
  • 7张璠.人机系统CAD及仿真置信度研究[M].北京:北京航空航天大学,1996..
  • 8付世波.驾驶员视域及操作域的计算机辅助判定[M].北京:北京航空航天大学,1997..
  • 9[1]Miller JR. The Assessment of Worth: A Systematic Procedure and-Its Experimental Validation [M]. doctoral dissertation. USA:M.I.T, 1966.
  • 10[2]Miller JR. Assessing Alternate Transportation Systems[M]. Memorandum RM- 5865 - DOT. USA: The RAND Corporation, 1969.

共引文献80

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部