期刊文献+

标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术在重型颅脑损伤中的应用(附37例报告)

Application of standard large trauma craniotomy in treating severe craniocerebral injury in 37 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的手术方法及临床疗效。方法将2003年1月~2008年12月我院收治的77例重型颅脑损伤患者随机分为两组,治疗组(n=37):采用标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术,对照组(n=40):采用常规骨瓣开颅术,观察记录两组术后恢复情况,并进行随访,比较两组的并发症发生率及预后。结果两组并发症总发生率分别为48.65%、72.50%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.60,P<0.05)。术后随访6~24月,按格拉斯哥预后评分标准(GOS)进行分级,两组存活率、良好率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.39,P<0.05;χ2=4.65,P<0.05)。结论标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤具有显露充分,减压彻底等优点,可明显改善预后。 【Objective】To explore the techniques and clinical curative effect of standard large trauma craniotomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury. 【Methods】77 patients with severe craniocerebral injury, who were hospitalized in our hospital from January 2003 to December 2008, were randomly divided into 2 groups: standard large trauma craniotomy was performed in experiment group (n =37) and routine temporoparietal craniectomy was performed in control group (n =40). The condition of postoperative recovery were observed and recorded and follow up was performed. Subsequently, a comparison was performed on the incidence of complications and prognosis.【Results】The total incidence of complications in experiment group and control group were 48.65%, 72.50%, respectively. There was statistically significant difference between them (χ2=4.60, P 0.05). Postoperative follow up of 6 ~24 months was performed. According to Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), survival rate and good and perfect rate were compared with statistically significant difference (χ2=4.39, P 0.05; χ2=4.65, P 0.05). 【Conclusion】 Standard large trauma craniotomy can be applied in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury with advantages such as sufficient exposure, thorough decompression and significantly improved prognosis.
作者 谭海
出处 《中国医学工程》 2009年第4期279-281,共3页 China Medical Engineering
关键词 重型颅脑损伤 标准大骨瓣开颅术 常规骨瓣开颅术 预后 severe craniocerebral injury standard large trauma craniotomy routine temporoparietal craniectomy prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

  • 1刘诗翔,刘波,梁燕,王文富.脑外伤后综合征与重型颅脑外伤的脑血流和血液流变学研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(5):386-387. 被引量:15
  • 2梁日初,瘳勇仕.颅脑外伤术后再手术原因分析[J].衡阳医学院学报,1996,24(3):216-217. 被引量:1
  • 3谢春雷,诸蕊玉,梁继娟.心理社会因素对颅脑外伤后综合征患者的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2007,26(2):145-147. 被引量:8
  • 4周强.老年重型颅脑外伤术后并发症的分析[J].中华神经外科杂志,1998,14:256-257.
  • 5周良辅.现代神经外科学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2003.691-698.
  • 6Phuenpathom N,Choomuang M.Outcome and outcome Prediction in acute subdural hematoma.Surg Neurol,1993;40:22~23
  • 7Gaab MR, Rittieredt M, Lorenz M, et al. Traumatic brain swelling and operative decompression: a prospective investigation. Acta Neurochir Suppl(Wien). 1990, 51(2): 326-328
  • 8Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev CA, et al. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosurgery, 1997,41 (1): 84 - 94
  • 9Fisher CM, Ojemann RG. Bilaterral decempressive craniectomy for worsening coma in acute subarachnoid hemorrage: observations in support of the procedure. Surg Neurol, 1994,41(1):65-74
  • 10Meier U, Zeilinger PS, Henzka O. The use of decompressive craniectomy for the management of severe head injuries. Acta Neurochir(Suppl), 2000,76(3):475 - 478

共引文献190

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部