期刊文献+

A comparison of the management models of protected areas between China and the southern Africa region

A comparison of the management models of protected areas between China and the southern Africa region
下载PDF
导出
摘要 A comparison of the management models of protected areas between China and the African south region allows reading and evaluating the similarities and differences in the use of management model as a management tool for protected areas and specifi- cally some positive and negative features of the management approaches in these two regions. Previous to this study it verified the designation of protected areas as increasing at a faster rate than ever before, comparatively much faster now in China than southern Africa regions. With the aim of evaluating similarities and differences in the use of management model as a management tool for pro- tected areas in China and southern Africa Region, both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Qualitative data were mainly from policy documents, scientific articles and magazine reports, whereas quantitative (secondary data) statistical data from Interna- tional Union for Conservation of Nature Resources (IUCN) and World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). In view of the data sources above, the study found that in China all the protected areas are state owned whilst in southern Africa regions there are some protected areas that are privately owned; also that the models or typology of governance applied are successful for the fact that they both combine co-management or collaborative management, community-conserved areas and private protected areas that are subject to greater success and can help design planning and management than those who use exclusively government management. To this, the study concluded that the use of management model is influenced by the type of governance a country applies to its reserved areas. A comparison of the management models of protected areas between China and the African south region allows reading and evaluating the similarities and differences in the use of management model as a management tool for protected areas and specifi- cally some positive and negative features of the management approaches in these two regions. Previous to this study it verified the designation of protected areas as increasing at a faster rate than ever before, comparatively much faster now in China than southern Africa regions. With the aim of evaluating similarities and differences in the use of management model as a management tool for pro- tected areas in China and southern Africa Region, both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Qualitative data were mainly from policy documents, scientific articles and magazine reports, whereas quantitative (secondary data) statistical data from Interna- tional Union for Conservation of Nature Resources (IUCN) and World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). In view of the data sources above, the study found that in China all the protected areas are state owned whilst in southern Africa regions there are some protected areas that are privately owned; also that the models or typology of governance applied are successful for the fact that they both combine co-management or collaborative management, community-conserved areas and private protected areas that are subject to greater success and can help design planning and management than those who use exclusively government management. To this, the study concluded that the use of management model is influenced by the type of governance a country applies to its reserved areas.
出处 《Forestry Studies in China》 CAS 2010年第3期151-157,共7页 中国林学(英文版)
关键词 protected areas SUSTAINABILITY China southern Africa region management model protected areas, sustainability, China, southern Africa region, management model
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Bakken B,Gould J,Kim D.1992.Experimentation in learning organizations:A management flight simulator approach.Europ J Operat Res,59(1):167-182.
  • 2Beltán J.2000.Indigenous and Traditional Peoples and Protected Areas:Principles.Guidelines and Case Studies.IUCN,Gland,Switzerland and Cambridge,UK and WWF International,Gland,Switzerland.
  • 3Child G.1995.Wildlife and People:The Zimbabwean Success,Wisdom Foundation,Harare,Zimbabwe.
  • 4De Jager J L V.1996.The establishment and operation of Conservancies in Namibia.In:Tarr P(ed.).Namibia Environment.Vol.1.Directorate of Environmental Affairs,Windhoek.
  • 5Feyerabend G B.2004.Understanding and optimizing governance:A quiet revolution for protected areas?Tiger(IUCN/CEESP).
  • 6GEF/CNRMP-GIobal Environment Facility China Nature Reserves Management Project 2002 Guidelines of Communities Based in Nature Resources Co-management in Nature Reserves.Department of Wildlife Conservation.State Forestry Administration 2002.
  • 7Hockings M,Stoiton S,Leverington F,Dudley N,Courrau J.2006.Evaluating Efiectiveness:A Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas.2nd edn.IUCN,Gland,Switzerland and Cambridge,UK.
  • 8IUCN.1994.Guidelines for protected area management categories.IUCN Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas with the assistance of the World Conservation Monitoting Centre.IUCN,Gland,Switzerland.
  • 9IUCN.2008.Red List summary statistics.Summary statistics of species listed in the 2008 of Threatened Species.
  • 10John T P.1999.The conservation challenge in sustaining rural environments.Department of Geography,Simon Fraser University,Burnaby,B.C.,Canada.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部