期刊文献+

中国工业部门能源消费反弹效应的估算——基于技术进步视角的实证研究 被引量:24

Estimating the Rebound Effect of Energy Consumption of Industrial Sectors in China Based on the Perspective of Technological Advancement
原文传递
导出
摘要 反弹效应是能源经济学中一个重要的研究课题,它的大小关系到能源政策的实施效果,在国内尚缺乏关于工业部门的实证检验。因此,本文基于新古典经济增长理论,按照索罗余数的思想估算了中国工业部门1979年-2007年的技术进步贡献率,并利用这一估算结果测算了1979年-2007年中国工业部门能源消费的反弹效应。实证研究的结果表明,1979年-2007年中国工业部门的平均能源反弹效应约为46.38%,而能源反弹效应总的变化趋势成递减状态。由技术进步而产生的能源效率提高,虽然没有使中国工业部门实现预期的节能目标,但总的呈现出能源节约的特征。本文研究的政策含义为:在依靠技术进步提高能源效率的同时,要注意能源价格政策、税收政策等的宏观调控,以实现预期的节能目标。 Rebound effect is an important issue in energy economics having received much attention in that the rebound effect of energy consumption directly affects the effectiveness of energy policies. According to a universally accepted economic view, the rebound effect determines the pure efficiency effect. Energy consumption would continue to grow even if energy efficiency is improved under the condition of the efficiency elasticity of energy demand being higher than 1. The rebound effect shows varying definitions in the energy economics literature. Most studies are only related to theoretical issues, showing less regarding analysis and estimation of the size of the potential rebound effects. On the other hand, most of empirical studies are associated merely with the residential sector or fuel consumption for transportation purposes, lacking empirical tests of the industrial sector. By adopting a thermodynamic point of view, this paper presents a framework incorporating three input factors (i.e., capital, labor and energy) of neoclassical product functions based on a brief review of related economic literature. Data of energy, economy and capital of industrial sectors in China during the period 1978-2007, the widely used econometric methods, as well as a ridge regression model were jointly utilized to estimate the contribution of technological progress in the industrial sectors in China. The size of rebound effect based on technological progress during the period 1979-2007 was subsequently calculated. Results show that the average size of rebound effect in the study period was roughly 46.38%, showing a generally decreasing trend with certain fluctuations. This indicates that improving the technological level of energy consumption is gradually becoming a critical tool to effectively utilize and reserve energy. Technological progress plays a role in improving energy efficiency; however, the expected goal of energy saving has not realized in the industrial sectors but displays a promising energy saving trend in the long term. The policy implications are that a sole emphasis on technological progress to improve energy utilization efficiency would not necessarily result in achieving the goal of energy consumption reduction or thoroughly solving problems of energy constraints. As such, it seems to be critical to reinforcing appropriate governmental regulations in the energy field. In the meanwhile, the expansion of economic scale in industrial sectors should be appropriately controlled, following the macro-control policies such as proper energy price policy and tax policy in order to achieve the expected goal of energy saving.
出处 《资源科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期1839-1845,共7页 Resources Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目资助(编号:70901016) 国家社科基金项目资助(编号:05BJY013) 辽宁省创新团队项目资助(编号:2007T050)
关键词 反弹效应 索罗余数 技术进步 能源消费 岭回归 Rebound effect Solow remainder Technological progress Energy consumption Ridge regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Khazzoom J D. Energy savings from the adoption of more efficient appliance[J]. Energy Journal, 1987, 3(1):117-124.
  • 2Brookes, Len. Energy efficiency and economic fallacies[J]. Energy Policy, 2000,28 (2): 199-201.
  • 3Greening L A, Greene D L, Difiglio C. Energy efficiency and consumption-the rebound effect-a survey [J]. Energy Policy, 2000, 28(6-7): 389-401.
  • 4Saunders H D. Does predicted rebound depend on distinguishing between energy and energy services? [J]. Energy Policy, 2000, 28 (6-7): 497-500.
  • 5Runar B, Tarek G, Jonas N. Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: Effects on consumption and emissions[J]. Energy Economics, 2007,29( 1 ):1-17.
  • 6Kenichi M. An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs [J]. Energy Economies, 2008, 30(6):2486-2516.
  • 7Karen T. Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy[J]. Energy Economics, 2009,31 (5) :648-666.
  • 8Berkhout P H G, Muskens J C, Velthuijsen J W, Defining the rebound effect[J].EnergyPolicy, 2000, 28(6):425-432.
  • 9Briol F, Keppler J H. Price, technology development and rebound effect [J]. Energy Policy, 2000, 28(6-7):457-469.
  • 10Bentzeu J. Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption [J]. Energy Economics, 2004, 26 (1): 123-134.

二级参考文献59

  • 1张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J].经济研究,2004,39(10):35-44. 被引量:5661
  • 2王青,顾晓薇,郑友毅.中国环境载荷与环境减压分析[J].环境科学,2006,27(9):1916-1920. 被引量:11
  • 3周勇,林源源.技术进步对能源消费回报效应的估算[J].经济学家,2007(2):45-52. 被引量:110
  • 4劳动保障部 博时基金管理有限公司.《中国养老保险基金测算与管理》[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2001年..
  • 5World Bank(1997), "Old Age Security: Pension Reform in China".
  • 6Eugene P. Seskin and Robert P. Parker, A Guide to the NIPA' s. www. bea. gov/bea/an/nipaguid.pdf.
  • 7Aaron, H.J., "The Social Insurance Paradox", Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science,1966, 32, 371-374.
  • 8Diamond, P., "National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model", American Economic Review, 1965,55, 1126-1150.
  • 9第三次全国工业普查办公室编.《中华人民共和国1995年第三次全国工业普查资料汇编》[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1997年..
  • 10国家统计局编.《工业统计年报》(1982-1999年)(内部资料)[Z].,..

共引文献653

引证文献24

二级引证文献332

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部