摘要
在知识经济时代,解决知识产权争议的途径必然是多元化的。各类诉讼外的争议解决机制(ADR)以诉讼所不具有的独特价值很好地契合了知识产权争议解决的特殊性需要,在救济诉讼能力不足、实现争议解决的实质正义以及维护知识产权法治秩序方面发挥着积极作用。在我国,知识产权争议ADR机制目前主要包括行政处理、仲裁、民间调解和谈判等模式,各模式在争议解决运作中又呈现出不同特征及利弊对比,最终的选择取决于当事人解决争议的主观利益需求。
The approaches of resolving intellectual property disputes must be diversified in the times of knowledge-based economy. All types of Alternative Dispute Resolutions （ADR） can satisfy the special needs of intellectual property disputes resolution with their unique values which litigation doesn＇t have. ADR can play positive roles in relieving the deficiencies of litigation,realizing the substantial justice of dispute resolution and preserving the intellectual property law order. Now in China,the intellectual property ADR mainly includes administrative resolution,arbitration,civil mediation and negotiation etc. Different models show diversified characteristics,advantages and disadvantages. The final say depends on the subjective interest needs of dispute resolution of parties.
出处
《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》
CAS
2010年第9期29-33,共5页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）
基金
第45批中国博士后科学基金面上资助(20090450383)
上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金(hzf09010)
关键词
知识产权争议
ADR
仲裁
调解
行政处理
intellectual property disputes
ADR
arbitration
mediation
administrative settlement
