期刊文献+

美托洛尔和卡托普利对扩张型心肌病的干预治疗比较 被引量:2

Effect of metoprol and captopril on dilated cardiomyopathy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨应用美托洛尔和卡托普利治疗扩张型心肌病(DCM)目的在于能否减轻免疫介导心肌损伤及改善慢性心室重构。方法:73例确诊为扩张型心肌病的患者,随机分3组:对照组为常规治疗;治疗1组在对照组的治疗基础上加用美托洛尔;治疗2组在治疗1组的治疗基础上同时加用卡托普利。观察治疗前后的心率(HR)、心胸比、血压、左室腔舒张末内径(LVDd)、左室射血分数(LVEF)的变化以及不良反应。结果:①治疗组治疗前后HR、心胸比与治疗前均有明显下降(P<0.01),LVDd、LVEF差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);②治疗1组无心衰组好转较心衰组更显著;治疗2组有心衰组好转较无心衰组更显著;③不良反应与药物剂量的增加有关。结论:应用美托洛尔及卡托普利对DCM的干预治疗,可以改善预后,改善扩张型心肌病的慢性心室重构。 Objective:To explore whether metoprol and captopril could alleviate the immune-mediated myocardial injury and improve chronic left ventricular remodeling of dilated cardiomyopathy(DCM).Method:73 patients diagnosed as DCM were divided into control group,Metoprol group and Metoprol+Captorpril group randomly.The adverse effects and the varieties of heart rate(HR)、 cardiothoracic ratio(C/T)、 blood pressure(BP)、 left ventricular end diastolic diameter(LVDd)and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)had been observed before and after the treatment.Result:①The HR and C/T deceased evidently(P0.01),while LVDd and LVEF maked prominent differences(P0.05)after the treatment with Metoprol and Captorpril.② In Metoprol treating group,the improvement of non-heart failure group was better than that of heart-failure group;while in captopril and metoprol treating group,the improvement of heart failure group was better than that of non-heart-failure group.③The adverse effects were related to the increase of drug dosage.Conclusion:The interfering treatment with metoprol and captopril can improve the prognosis and the left ventricular remodeling of DCM evidently.
作者 余钷 黄志培
出处 《临床急诊杂志》 CAS 2010年第4期214-215,218,共3页 Journal of Clinical Emergency
关键词 扩张型心肌病 美托洛尔 卡托普利 干预治疗 DCM Metoprol captopril Interfering treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

  • 1RIDKER P M, DANIELSON E, FONSECA F A, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C reactive protein[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008,359:2195-2207.
  • 2NISSEN S E, TUZCU E M, SCHOENHAGEN P, et al. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipidlowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis a randomized controlled trial[J]. JAMA, 2004,291 : 1071-1080.
  • 3NISSEN S E, NICHOLLS S J, WOLSKI K, et al. Comparison of pioglitazone vs glimepiride on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: the PERISCOPE randomized controlled trial [J]. JAMA, 2008,299:1561-1573.
  • 4ROSS R. Atherosclerosis- an inflammatory disease[J]. N Engl J Med,1999,340:115-126.
  • 5DEVARAJ S, XU D Y, JIALAL I. C-reactive protein increases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression and activity in human aortic endothelial cells implications for the metabolic syndrome and atherothrombosis[J]. Circulation, 2003,107 : 398-404.
  • 6TORZEWSKI M, RIST C, MORTENSEN R F, et al. C-reactive protein in the arterial intima: role of Creactive protein receptor-dependent monocyte recruitment in atherogenesis[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2000,20:2094-2099.
  • 7MOLD C, GEWURZ H, DU CLOS T W. Regulation of complement activation by C-reactive protein [J]. Immunopharmacology, 1999,42:23- 30.
  • 8RIDKER P M, BURING J E, COOK N R, et al. C- reactive protein, the metabolic syndrome, and risk of incident cardiovascular events: an 8-year follow-up of 14,719 initially healthy American women[J]. Circulation, 2003,107 :391-397.
  • 9McTAGGART F, BUCKETT L, DAVIDSON R, et al. Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of rosuvasrain, a new 3 hydrlglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2001,87:28B-32B.
  • 10肖华,廖玉华,王敏,陈志坚,刘坤,郭和平.扩张型心肌病新型抗钙通道抗体的发现[J].临床心血管病杂志,2007,23(8):601-605. 被引量:7

共引文献50

同被引文献12

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部