5Gall D, Nielsen K. Comparison of some methods for determing cutoff values for serological assays: a retrospective study using the fluorescence polarization assay. J Immunoassay Immunochem,2001,22 : 85-98.
6Ridge SE, Vizard AL. Determination of the optimal cutoff value for a serological assay: an example using the Johne's Absorbed E IA. J Clin Microbiol,1993,31:1256-1261.
7Larsson A, Karlsson-Parra A, Sjoquist J. Use of chicken antibodies in enzyme immunoassays to avoid interference by rheumatoid factors. Clin Chem,1991,37:411-414.
8Carlander D, Larsson A. Avian antibodies can eliminate interference due to complement activation in ELISA. Ups J Med Sci ,2001,106:189-195.
9Larsson A,Wejaker PE, Forsberg PO, et al. Chicken antibodies: a tool to avoid interference by complement activation in ELISA. J Immunol Methods,1992,156:79-83.
10Bormer OP. Interference of complement with the binding of carcinoembryonic antigen to solid-phase monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol Methods, 1989,121:85-93.