期刊文献+

煤矿井下噪声暴露工人扩展高频测听 被引量:2

Extended high frequency audiometry in coal miners
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨扩展高频纯音听阈在听力监测及早期发现噪声性听力损害中的价值。方法对73名(142耳)耳科正常者(对照组)和78名(154耳)煤矿井下噪声暴露工人(实验组,其中常频纯音听阈正常组45名90耳,常频纯音听阈异常组33名64耳),行常频纯音测听、扩展高频纯音(0.5~16kHz)测听,将两组结果进行比较。结果实验组纯音听阈在4.0、6.0kHz及扩展高频区与对照组比较明显升高,扩展高频未检出率逐渐增加,差异有显著意义(P<0.05);常频纯音听阈正常的实验组与对照组比较,其扩展高频听阈升高,未检出率在14kHz开始升高,差异有显著意义(P<0.05);常频听阈异常的实验组与对照组比较,扩展高频听阈升高,未检出率在11.2kHz开始增加,差异均有显著意义(P<0.01)。结论扩展高频测听可用于噪声性聋的早期诊断和听力监测。 Objective To investigate the value of extended high frequency audiometry in early detection and diagnosis of noise induced deafness in coal miners. Methods Conventional pure tone audiometry and extended high frequency audiometry (0.5 ~ 16 kHz) were performed in 73 (142 ears) young adults with normal hearing and 78 (154 ears) coal miners. Of the 78 miners, 45 (90 ears) had normal thresholds and 33 (64 ears) were abnormal on conventional pure tone audiometry. Results Hearing thresholds in coal miners at 4 kHz, 6 kHz and extended high frequencies were higher than the normal controls (P 0.05). Rates of no hearing at 11.2 kHz or higher frequencies in this group increased compared with the normal control (P 0.01). Miners with normal thresholds on conventional pure tone audiometry showed higher thresholds over extended high frequencies compared with control group, with increasing rates of no hearing at 14 kHz and higher frequencies (P 0.05). Conclusion Expended high frequency audiometry appears to be useful in early detection and diagnosis of noise induced deafness.
出处 《中华耳科学杂志》 CSCD 2010年第3期303-306,共4页 Chinese Journal of Otology
基金 河北省科技支撑计划项目(072761505)
关键词 纯音测听 扩展高频测听 噪声性聋 Pure tone audiometry Extended high frequency audiometry Noise induced hearing loss
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

  • 1[1]Musiek FE, Baran JA. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions:hit and false-positive rates in normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects. Am J Oto1,1997,18:454-461.
  • 2[2]Kim DO, Paparello J, Jung MD, et al. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss performance regarding sensitivity,specificity and operating characteristics. Acta Otolaryngol,1996,116:3-14.
  • 3[3]Suckfull M, Schineewei S, Dreher A, et al. Evaluation of TEOAE and DPOAE measurements for the assessment of auditory threshold in sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol(Stockh),1996,116:528-588.
  • 4[6]Van Der Hulst RJAM,Dresehler W,Urbanus NAM.Highfrequency audiometry in prospective clinical research of ototoxicity due to platinum derivatives. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1998,97:133.
  • 5[7]Attias J, Brealoff I, Reshef I, et al. Evaluation noise induced hearing loss with distortion product otoaconstic emissions. Br J Audiol,1998,32:39-47.
  • 6[11]Arnold DJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1999,125:215-222.
  • 7Tonndorf J,Kurman B.High frequency audiometry[].Annals of Otology Rhinology Laryngology.1984
  • 8Fausti SA,Erickson DA,Frey RH,et al.The effects of noise upon human hearing sensitivity from 8 000 to 20 000 Hz[].The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America.1981
  • 9姜鸿彦,王锦玲,黄维国,邱建华,刘顺利.噪声对豚鼠耳蜗核一氧化氮合酶阳性神经元及其基因表达的影响[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1997,32(5):268-272. 被引量:7
  • 10胡宁,姜伟,郭宏光,汪磊.畸变产物耳声发射幅值与超高频纯音听阈的关系[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2000,8(4):202-204. 被引量:14

共引文献31

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部