摘要
目的 比较不同清洗方法清洗气管内套管的效果,以选择最佳方法.方法 将已污染的气管内套管随机分为三组,A组（6 915例）气管内套管使用1%过氧化氢浸泡后手工清洗,B组（7 209例）气管内套管使用多酶清洗剂浸泡后手工清洗,C组（7 753例）使用气管内套管1%过氧化氢联合多酶清洗剂浸泡后手工清洗,采用人工目测的方法检测洁净度.结果 三组洁净合格率分别为82.68%,88.93%,95.51%,不同种清洗方法在清洗合格率方面的差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 多酶清洗剂联合1%过氧化氢的方法优于两者单独使用.
Objective To compare the effects of three methods of cleaning endotrachesl tubes for the best option. Methods Contaminated endotracheal tubes were randomly assigned into 3 groups. The tubes in group A （n=6915） were soaked in 1% hydrogen peroxide; the tubes in group B （n =7 209） were soaked in multi-enzyme detergent; the tubes in group C （ n = 7 753 ） were soaked in the two solutions mentioned above in sequence. The cleanliness of all tubes after hand wash was assessed by visual observation. Results The eligibility rate of the three cleaning methods were 82. 68 %, 88.93% and 95.51%, respectively, with statistical significance（P ＜ 0. 05 ）. Conclusions Cleaning endotracheal tubes with multi-enzyme detergent and 1% hydrogen peroxide in combination is better than using them separately.
出处
《中华现代护理杂志》
2010年第28期3368-3370,共3页
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词
气管内套管
清洗方法
效果
Endotracheal tube Cleaning methods Effect
