期刊文献+

理性选择革命与现代西方集团理论的发展——利益集团形成机制的视角 被引量:2

Revolution of Rational Choice and Development of Modern Western Group Theory——From the Perspective of How Interest Groups Are Formed
原文传递
导出
摘要 现代西方集团理论的发展和方法论的突破密切相关。多元主义理论深受行为主义的影响,认为社会结构的变迁促使具有共同利益的群体志愿组建利益集团。而集体行动理论采用理性分析的方法,认为人们在组建利益集团的集体行动过程中将遭遇"志愿失灵"。集体行动理论与多元主义之间的理论争论不仅折射了从行为主义到理性分析的方法论变迁,它还为现代集团理论的发展创造了条件。 The marked development of modern group theory is closely related to its methodological breakthroughs.In the eyes of pluralism,which is heavily influenced by behaviorism,it is the changes in social structure that force people with common interest to form interest groups voluntarily.But from the angle of collective action theory,which assumes a rational analytic method,the collective action leading to formation of interest groups will encounter voluntary failure.The controversy between pluralism theory and collective action theory not only illustrates the methodological change from behaviorism to rational choice,but also paves the way for the development of group theory.
作者 高春芽
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第10期80-85,共6页 Teaching and Research
基金 2009年国家社科基金青年项目"西方集体行动理论发展跟踪研究"(项目编号:09CZZ006)成果之一
关键词 行为主义 理性选择 利益集团 多元主义 集体行动 behaviorism rational choice interest group pluralism collective action[
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Bentley, Arthur. The Process of Government [M]. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1995.
  • 2Dowling, R. E.. Pressure Group Theory: Its Methodological Range[J]. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 54, No. 4, 1960.
  • 3杜鲁门.政治过程[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2005.
  • 4Berry, Jeffrey. On the Origins of Public Interest Groups: A Test of Two Theories [J]. Polity, Vol. 10, No. :3, 1978.
  • 5Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action [M] . Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  • 6Nownes, Anthony and Neeley, Grant. Public Interest Group Entrepreneurship and Theories of Group Mobilization[J]. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1996.
  • 7Olson, Mancur. Economy, Logic and Action [J]. Society, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1990.
  • 8格林,沙皮罗.理性选择理论的病变[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.
  • 9Salisbury, Robert. Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions[J]. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 78, No. 1, 1984.
  • 10格林斯坦,波尔斯比.政治学手册精选(上卷)[C].北京:商务印书馆,1996.

共引文献4

同被引文献15

  • 1[美]曼瑟尔·奥尔森.权力与繁荣[M].苏长和等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
  • 2[美]曼瑟尔·奥尔森.国家的兴衰[M].李增刚译.上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
  • 3[美]奥利弗·E.威廉姆森.资本主义经济制度[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002.
  • 4[美]曼瑟尔·奥尔森 陈郁 郭宇峰 李崇新译.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995..
  • 5[美]道格拉斯·C.诺思.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联出版社,1994.225—226,225.
  • 6[美]戴维·米勒.布莱克维尔政治学百科全书[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992.563.
  • 7Bentley, Arthur. The Process of Government [ M ]. New Brunswick :Transaction Publishers, 1995:226.
  • 8[美]登姆塞茨.关于产权的理论[M]//财产权利与制度变迁:产权学派与新制度学派译文集.上海:上海人民出版社,2004:98.
  • 9恩格斯.家庭、私有制和周家的起源[M].北京:人民出版社,2003:78.
  • 10Weingast , Barry. The Economic Role of Political In- stitutions: Market Preserving Federalism and Eco- nomic Developmenl [ J ]. Journal of Law, Econom- ics, and Organization, 1995, ( 11 ) : 1 - 31.

引证文献2

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部