摘要
我国现行的死亡赔偿金制度在赔偿数额方面存在明显的城乡差异,因此引发了理论界、实务界及社会上关于"同命不同价"的激烈辩论。《侵权责任法》的出台在一定程度上回答了这一问题,但是否符合法理而非社会压力下妥协的产物还有待商榷。通过讨论死亡赔偿金的性质,从生命双重价值观和人身损害赔偿类型两个角度解读了死亡赔偿金数额差异的合理性,对《侵权责任法》的规定提出了自己的见解,并且在指出我国死亡赔偿金制度不足的基础上提出了几点立法建议。
The amount of the compensation of our current compensation for death system is obvious different between city and country,this gives rise to the academic,the practicing and the society’s debates about ＂the same death but the different compensation＂.＂The Law of Tort Responsibility＂ replies the problem to some extend,but it still needs to discuss whether it conforms to legal principle rather than the outcome of compromise with the society pressure.According to the discussion of the compensation’s nature,the concept of life value,the style of compensation for the torts’ damage of human body,to explain the rational of the different amount of the compensation,to put forward the personal perspective of the regulation of ＂The Law Of Tort Responsibility＂,and put some suggestions on the basis of taking the shortcomings of the current compensation for death system in our country.
出处
《新疆职业大学学报》
2010年第5期68-70,共3页
Journal of Xinjiang Vocational University
关键词
死亡赔偿金
同命不同价
同命同价
compensation for death
different compensation for the same death
same compensation for the same death
