期刊文献+

二元语义方法在仿真系统可信性评估中的应用 被引量:2

Application of Two-Tuple Linguistic Method in Credibility Evaluation of Simulation System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对仿真系统可信性评估中所涉及的不确定性和模糊性因素,提出了基于二元语义的评估方法。将专家针对各指标和因素给出的语言信息用二元语义的方式来表示,结合最优化模型的群决策方法,对因素层的评价信息进行集结,依此作为各指标的群体评价值,利用LOWA算子对指标层的权重信息进行集结,采用加权平均算子对指标层进行集结,得到二元语义形式的仿真系统可信性综合评价值。最后通过实例分析证明该方法的实用性和可操作性。 Considering the uncertainty and fuzzy factors in the process of credibility evaluation of simulation system, a new evaluation method based on two-tuple linguistic method was proposed. Firstly, the expert's linguistic information of attribute and factor was represented in the form of two-tuple linguistic. Then, the group evaluation of each attribute can be obtained by mass the evaluation of factors based on group decision method of optimization model, and the weight of each attribute could be massed through aggregation operator of Linguistic Order Weighted Averaging (LOWA). Furthermore, the weighting average operator was proposed and adopted to obtain the comprehensive evaluation of the credibility of simulation system in two-tuple form. Finally, an example was given to illustrate the reasonability and validity of the proposed method.
出处 《电光与控制》 北大核心 2010年第12期41-43,70,共4页 Electronics Optics & Control
基金 陕西省自然科学基金(2007F40) 总装备部"十一.五"武器装备预先研究项目(513040104)
关键词 可信性评估 仿真系统 二元语义 集结算子 群评价 credibility evaluation simulation system two-tuple linguistic aggregation operators group evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1牛作成,吴德伟,雷磊.军事装备效能评估方法探究[J].电光与控制,2006,13(5):98-101. 被引量:30
  • 2庄瑾,张善文.防空作战系统效能的模糊综合评判研究[J].电光与控制,2005,12(4):44-46. 被引量:18
  • 3刘飞,马萍,杨明,孙国兵,王子才.大型复杂仿真系统可信度量化方法研究[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2006,38(5):169-174. 被引量:7
  • 4罗均平,于伟,李冬岩,翟永庆.语言判断矩阵在确定多属性决策问题权重中的应用[J].电光与控制,2006,13(1):102-104. 被引量:6
  • 5HERRERA F, MARTINEZ L. A two-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words [ J ]. Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2000,8 (6) :746-752.
  • 6HERRERA F, MARTINEZ L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuple for dealing with muhigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making [ J ]. IEEE Trans on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 2001,31 ( 2 ) : 227 -234.
  • 7HERRERA F, MARTINEZ L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model based on a symbolic translation [ C l// Proceeding Eurofuse-Science'99 Conferences Sogesci-BVWB, Budapest, 1999 : 25-28.
  • 8WU Jing, WU Xiaoyan, ZHOU Yanyan. Research on design and realization of steering flight visual simulation system [ C]//Asia Simulation Conference 2008/The 7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scientific Computing, Beijing, China: IEEE, 2008 : 1567- 1570.
  • 9YAGER R R, FILEV D P. Induced ordered weighted averaging operators [ J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, 1999,29 (2) : 141-150.

二级参考文献26

  • 1陈岩,樊治平.语言判断矩阵的一致性及相关问题研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(4):136-141. 被引量:52
  • 2岳韶华,周国安,张金成.防空C^3I作战效能研究[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2002,3(1):30-32. 被引量:12
  • 3张最良.军事运筹学[M].北京:军事科学出版社,2002..
  • 4黄坤大.指挥自动化系统[M].北京:军事谊文出版社,1994..
  • 5陈珽.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987..
  • 6张卓.作战效能评估[M].北京:军事科学出版社,1996..
  • 7张最良.军事运筹学[M].军事科学出版社,1993..
  • 8王连芬 许树柏.层次分析法引论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990..
  • 9罗雪山,张维明.C^3I系统理论基础-C^3I系统建模方法与技术[M].长沙:国防科技大学出版社,2000..
  • 10Dale K.Issues related to quantifying simulation validation[C]//Proceedings of 2001 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop.Orlando,FL:SISO,2001.

共引文献56

同被引文献20

  • 1吴征宇,刘胤田.一种VV&A任务选择的优化方法[J].现代防御技术,2008,36(2):138-142. 被引量:1
  • 2吴晓燕,刘兴堂,任淑红.仿真系统VV&A研究[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2006,7(5):91-94. 被引量:8
  • 3KILIKAUSKAS M, HALL D H. The use ofM&S VV&A as a risk mitigation strategy in defense acquisition[J]. Joumal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 2005, 2(4): 209-216.
  • 4HAIDER S, LEVIS A H. Dynamic influence nets: an extension of timed influence nets for modeling dynamic uncertain situations[C]//10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Washington D C, USA: [s.n.], 2005: 2-18.
  • 5Department of Defense. Risk and its impact on W&A-special topics paper of verification validation and accreditation recommended practice guides (VV&A RPG) BUILD 3.0[EB/OL]. [2007-06-27]. http://vva.dmso.mil/ Special_topics/Risk/default.htm.
  • 6U S Department of Defense. Standard practice for systems safety[S]. Military Standard MIL-STD-882D, 2000.
  • 7ELELE J N. Assessing risk levels of verification, validation, and accreditation of models and simulations[J]. International Test and Evaluation Association Journal, 2008, 29(2): 190-200.
  • 8ELELE J N, SMITH J. Risk-based verification, validation, and accreditation process[C]//Modeling and Simulation for Defense Systems and Applications V. S Orlando, FL: SPIE, 2010.
  • 9Brade D, Koester A. Risk-based validation & verification levels definition[C]// Proceedings of the European Simulation Interoperability Workshop. London: Simulation Interoperability Standardization Organization (SISO), 2001: 01E-SIW-013.
  • 10Department of Defense. Risk and its impact on VV&A-special topics paper of verification validation and accreditation recommended practice guides (VV&A RPG) BUILD 3.0[EB/OL]. (2006-9). http://vva.dmso.mil/Special-topics/Risk/default.htm.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部