期刊文献+

通勤者下班后非工作活动时间选择决策行为 被引量:2

Decision-making Behavior of Commuters' Non-working Activity Time Choice After Work
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了解析通勤者的行为决策机理,通过分析吉林市居民出行调查数据,运用分群持续时间模型(SPD模型)对通勤者下班后非工作活动的参与以及活动开始时间进行分析,检验了通勤者的社会、经济及出行特征等属性对活动驻停及非工作活动开始时间的影响。结果表明:应用SPD模型,能区分出在非晚高峰从单位至家途中的非工作活动,提高预测结果的准确性,也可有效预测不同群体的通勤者非工作活动参与的时间,为交通管理部门制定需求管理措施从而引导通勤者出行提供理论依据。 In order to understand commuters' behavior decision-making mechanism through analysis of the surveyed travel data of Jilin city,commuters' non-working activity time choice behaviors after work were analyzed by using a split-population duration(SPD) model.The influences of commuters' socio-economic attribute and travel characteristics on activity stop and start time of non-working activity were verified.The results show that SPD model can differentiate the activity from work to home but not in the evening peak,which can make the forecasting more truly.Moreover,the model can effectively predict different commuters' non-working activity time which provide theoretical reference for transportation programming and management.
出处 《中国公路学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期92-95,120,共5页 China Journal of Highway and Transport
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAJ18B02) 吉林大学研究生创新基金项目(20101021)
关键词 交通工程 活动-出行行为 SPD模型 行为决策 通勤者 非工作活动时间 traffic engineering activity-travel behavior SPD model behavior decision-making commuter non-working activity time
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1谢秉磊,毛科俊,胡小明.基于区间数的多属性出行方式选择模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2009,9(4):61-64. 被引量:7
  • 2范文博,李志纯,蒋葛夫.基于参考依赖法的出行者日常路径选择行为建模[J].交通运输工程学报,2009,9(1):96-99. 被引量:12
  • 3王建军,陈梦月,常振文,吴海刚.基于驾驶人出行心理的道路网指路系统设计[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2009,29(2):75-79. 被引量:10
  • 4BHAT C R,STEED J L. A Continuous time Model of Departure Time Choice for Urban Shopping Trips [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2002,36 (3) : 207-224.
  • 5BHAT C R. Accommodating Flexible Substitution Patterns in Multi-dimensional Choice Modeling: Formulation and Application to Travel Mode and Departure Time Choice [J]. Transportation Research Part B,1998,32(7) :455-466.
  • 6BHAT C R. A Model of Post home Arrival Activity Participation Behavior [ J]. Transportation Research Part B,1998,32(6) :387- 400.
  • 7HAMED M M, MANNERING F L. Modeling Travelers' Postwork Activity Involvement: Toward a New Methodology[J]. Transportation Science, 1993, 27(4) :381-394.
  • 8ABU-EISHEH S A, MANNERING F L. Discrete/ Continuous Analysis of Commuters' Route and Departure Time Choices [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1987(1138) :27-34.
  • 9MANNERING F L, HAMED M M. Occurence,Frequency, and Duration of Commuters' Work-to-home Departure Delay[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1990,24 (2) : 99-109.
  • 10CHANG H L, YEH T H. Exploratory Analysis of Motorcycle Holding Time Heterogeneity Using a Split-population Duration Model[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2007,41 (6) : 587-596.

二级参考文献27

  • 1徐学敏.环城高速公路交通标志的设置[J].公路交通科技,2003,20(z1):139-143. 被引量:15
  • 2许叶军,达庆利.不确定型多属性决策的权系数确定及其应用[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2005,14(5):434-436. 被引量:40
  • 3王根城,刘小明,安居.基于城市道路功能划分的交叉口指路标志信息分级体系[J].道路交通与安全,2007,7(1):20-23. 被引量:4
  • 4翟忠民.道路交通组织[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2004..
  • 5ABDELATY M A, KITAMURA R, JOVANIS P P. Investi gating effect of travel time variability on route choice using repeated-measurement stated preference data[J].Transpor tation Research Record, 1995, 1493:39-45.
  • 6CANTAREALLA G E, CASCETTA E. Dynamic processes and equilibrium in transportation networks: towards a unifying theor[J]. Transportation Science, 1995, 29(4): 305-329.
  • 7HALL R W. Travel outcome and performance: the effect of uncertainty on accessibility[J]. Transportation Research B, 1983, 17(4): 275-290.
  • 8HUANG Hai-jun, LI Zhbchun. A multiclass multicriteria Logitbased traffic equilibrium assignment model under ATIS[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 176 (3): 1464-1477.
  • 9LI Zhi-chun, HUANG Hai jun, LAM W H K, et al. A model for evaluation of transport policies in multimodal networks with road and parking capacity constraints[J]. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms, 2007, 6(2): 239-257.
  • 10KAHNEMAN D, KNETSCH J L, THALER R. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and the status quo bias[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, 5(1): 193-201.

共引文献26

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部