期刊文献+

描写充分与解释充分之张力:原则与参数框架的理论动因

Tension Between Descriptive Adequacy and Explanatory Adequacy:The Theoretical Drive for the Principles and Parameters Framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过总结Chomsky的"句法理论中的原则与参数"一文,回顾原则与参数框架产生的历史背景及其理论动因,梳理原则与参数框架的主要思想及内容,分析原则与参数框架提出的意义、它所面临的挑战及其发展前景。描写充分性与解释充分性之间的张力是原则与参数框架形成的理论动因。在生成语法追求"超越解释的充分性"这一更高目标的过程中,我们看到的是继续前进中的原则与参数。 Based on a summary of Chomsky's(1981)"Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory",this paper reviews the historical background and theoretical drive of the principles and parameters(PP) framework and discusses the its main though and content and analyses its significance its theoretical drive and its significance in the field,and points out the challenges and promises for this framework.It is shown that the tension between descriptive adequacy and explanatory adequacy is the theoretical drive for the PP framework.In the process of pursuing a higher goal-beyond the explanatory adequacy,what is expected is a revised and fledged PP framework.
作者 刘艾娟 李芝
出处 《长春理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第5期71-74,共4页 Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 北京中医药大学2009自主选题中青年教师资助项目(JYBZZ-JB058)
关键词 原则与参数 描写充分性 解释充分性 principles and parameters framework descriptive adequacy explanatory adequacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1宁春岩.导读[A] //In J.Ouhalla(2001).Introducing Transformational Grammar:From Principles and Parameters to Minimalism[M].Beijing Language Teaching and Research Press/Edward Arnold (Publishers) Limited,2001:23.
  • 2刘润清.现代语言学名著选读[M].北京:测绘出版社,1988(9)..
  • 3Chomsky,N.Bare phrase structure[M] //In H.Campos & P.Kempchinsky (eds.).Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory.Washington,D.C.:Georgetown University Press,1995a:52.
  • 4Chomsky,N.Principles and parameters in syntactic theory[M] //In N.Hornsom.& D.Lightfont (eds.).Explanation in Linguistics:The Logic Problem of Language Acquisition.London and New York:Longman,1981.
  • 5Peters,S.& Ritchie,R.On the generative power of transformational grammars[J].Information Science and Control,1971 (18):483-501.
  • 6徐烈炯.生成语法三十年[J].外语教学与研究,1987,19(4):8-13. 被引量:5
  • 7Chomsky,N.The Minimalist Program[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1995b.
  • 8Chomsky,N.Beyond explanatory adequacy[G] //In A.Belletti (ed.).Structures and Beyond:The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (vol.3).Oxford:OUP,2004.
  • 9Chomsky,N.Three factors in language design[J].Linguistic In-quiry,2005,36 (1):1-22.
  • 10Lardiere.D.Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition[J].Second Language Research,2009,25(2):173-227.

二级参考文献35

  • 1戴曼纯.普遍语法可及性三假说[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(1):37-43. 被引量:47
  • 2戴曼纯.中介语可变性之争及其意义[J].外语与外语教学,1999(1):15-18. 被引量:21
  • 3潘海华,胡建华.汉语复合反身代词与英语反身代词比较研究[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(4):241-247. 被引量:31
  • 4Chomsky, N. 1991. Linguistics and adjacent fields: A personal view[A]. In A. Kasher (ed.). 1991. The Chomskyan Turn [C]. Cambridge, MA.:Basil Blackwell. 3-25.
  • 5Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge MA. : The MIT Press.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 1999. Derivation by Phase [M]. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics. No. 18. Cambridge, MA. : MITWPL.
  • 7Clahsen, H. & P. Muysken. 1989. The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 5 (1):1-29.
  • 8Epstein, S. et al. 1996. Second language acquistion: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research [J]. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 677-758.
  • 9Eubank, L. 1993/1994. On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development [J]. Language Acquisition 3 (3):183-208.
  • 10Eubank, L. Optionality and the initial state in L2 development [A]. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (eds.). 1994. 369-388.

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部