期刊文献+

以CD203c分子为标记判断慢性荨麻疹血清对嗜碱粒细胞的活化 被引量:1

Evaluation of basophil activations induced by chronic urticaria sera taking CD203c as a marker
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察慢性荨麻疹血清对嗜碱粒细胞CD203c表达的影响,以建立流式细胞术检测慢性荨麻疹血清中自身抗体的方法。方法以CRTH2-FITC、CD203c PE和CD3Per-CP 3种抗体标记白细胞,建立嗜碱粒细胞活化试验,用流式细胞仪测定细胞活化及荧光强度。结果自身血清皮肤试验(ASST)阳性组CD203c阳性细胞的百分率为91.24±6.22,与ASST阴性组(3.33±1.24)及健康对照组(3.05±1.07)比较具有明显差异(P<0.01);ASST阴性组与健康对照组比较无显著差异。ASST阳性组CD203c平均荧光强度(MFI)为58.2±12.55,显著高于ASST阴性组(3.70±1.32,P<0.01)和健康对照组(3.20±1.29,P<0.01),ASST阴性组与健康对照组的MFI比较无显著差异。结论用CRTH2-FITC、CD203c-PE和CD3Per-CP 3种抗体,可以观察嗜碱粒细胞表面的CD203c表达程度,以判断荨麻疹血清对嗜碱粒细胞的活化。 Objective To evaluate the effects of chronic urticaria sera on CD203c expressions on basophils so as to construct ways to detect autoantibodies in chronic urticaria sera by flow cytometry.Methods Using CRTH2-FITC、CD203c-PE and CD3Per-CP fluorescent monoclonal antibodies,basophil activation test were constructed to assay cell activations and fluorescent intensities.Results Incubation of donor basophils with sera from patients with chronic urticaria and positive autologous serum skin test(ASST)demonstrated significant increasing positive basophil percent,91.24±6.22 vs 3.33±1.24,P〈0.01;and upregulation of CD203c expression,the mean fluorescent intensities(MFI)58.2±12.55 vs 3.70±1.32,P〈0.01.There are no statistically differences between the ASST negative group and the health group.Conclusion The CD203c expressing on basophils can effectively be observed by CRTH2-FITC,CD203c-PE and CD3Per-CP fluorescent monoclonal antibodies and making gates three times on flow cytometry,so that basophil activations by chronic urticaria sera can be evaluated.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第23期3200-3201,共2页 Chongqing medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30972647) 第三军医大学科研基金资助项目(2008XG179)
关键词 慢性荨麻疹 自身抗体 流式细胞术 chroncic urticaria autoantibodies flowcytometrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献42

共引文献95

同被引文献47

  • 1孙永莲.CD45研究进展[J].国外医学(免疫学分册),1994,17(2):62-65. 被引量:1
  • 2朱立华.细胞分化抗原CD45辅助设门在白血病表型分析中的应用[J].中华医学检验杂志,1996,19(6):369-374. 被引量:5
  • 3徐翀,王小蕊,蒋黎敏,王连升,袁向亮,潘秀军,沈立松.流式细胞术分析户尘螨致敏的嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验及其临床意义[J].检验医学,2007,22(3):245-250. 被引量:10
  • 4Ebo DG, Bridts CH, Hagendorens MM, et al. Basophil Activation Test by Flow Cytometry :Present and Future Applications in Allergol- ogy [J]. Cytometry B Clin Cytom,2008,74(4) :201-210.
  • 5McGowan EC ,Saini S. Update on the Performance and Application of Basophil Activation Tests [J]. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep,2013,13 (1):101-109.
  • 6Boehner BS. Systemic activation of basophils and eosinpohils : markers and consequences [J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol,2000,106(Suppl): $292-$302.
  • 7Sanz ML,Gmaboa PM,Garcia-Aviles C,et al. Flow-cytometric cellu- lar allergen stimulation test in latex allergy [J]. Int Arch Allergy Im- munol, 2003,130 ( 1 ) : 33-39.
  • 8Kucera P,Cvackova M,Hulikova K,et al. Basophil Activation Can Predict Clinical Sensitivity in Patients After Venom immunotherapy [J]. Int Arch Allergy Immunol,2003,130( 1 ):33-39.
  • 9Kim MS,Cho YJ. Flow Cytometry-Assisted Basophil Activation Test as a Safe Diagnostic Tool for Aspirin/NSAID Hypersenstivity [J].A1- lergy Asthma hnmunol Res, 2012,4 (3) : 137-142.
  • 10Prussin C,Metcalfe DD. IgE ,mast cells,basophils,and eosinophils [J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol,2006, 117 (2 Suppl Mini-Primer):S450- $456.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部