摘要
目的比较一次法和分次法根管治疗术的疗效,评价一次性根管治疗术的可行性。方法选择160例慢性牙髓炎患者,随机分成两组,用AHplus根管充填糊剂加牙胶尖侧方加压法,分别一次和多次完成根管充填术;术后7d进行复诊检查,比较两种治疗方法的术后疼痛情况,治疗后1年随访,比较疗效。结果两种治疗方法术后7d疼痛情况经统计学检验无显著性差异(P>0.05)。术后1年疗效,一次法根充成功率为91.4%(64/70),分次法根充成功率为95.0%(76/80),经统计学检验无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论一次法根充和分次根充在术后疼痛和术后1年的疗效上均没有显著性差异,一次法根充不失为一种有效的临床治疗方法。
Objective To compare curative effect of two different root canal therapy,in order to evaluate the feasibility of One-appointment root canal therapy.Methods 160 patients with chronic pulpitis were divided into two groups at random.In one group,the therapy was finished in one vist,and in the other,several visit times were needed for the therapy.Both of them were used AH plus oxpara and gutta-percha cones with the lateral condensation technique.Results The pain incidence rates 7 days after treatment were not significantly different between the two groups（P0.05）.The achievement ratio of One-appointment root canal therapy group was 91.4%,and the other group was 95.0%.No significant differences between two groups were found（P0.05）.Conclusion One-appointment root canal therapy has no differences with the therapy need several visit times in pain incidence rates and achievement ratio.It is an effective clinic method.
出处
《当代医学》
2010年第36期114-115,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
根管充填
一次性根管充填
疼痛
疗效
Canal obturation
One-appointment root canal therapy
Pain
Curative effect
