期刊文献+

上市公司大小非减持影响因素的实证分析 被引量:25

Empirical Study on Factors Affecting the Floating of Non-tradable Shares of Listed Companies
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以2006年6月—2009年12月的大小非减持事件为研究对象,从控制权市场、处置效应、信息优势的角度,检验了影响大小非减持比例的因素。实证研究发现:①大非的减持比例显著低于小非,但控制权市场并不显著影响减持比例;②处置效应是影响大小非减持比例的主要原因,在市场单边下跌的过程中,处置效应的作用体现得更加明显,这表明大小非的减持行为更多地受到市场情绪的影响;③当上市公司披露业绩低于分析师预期时,在业绩披露前期大非减持比例高,这揭示了大非作为内部人具有一定的信息优势。 This article studies the floating of non-tradable shares during the period from June 2006 to December 2009 from the angle of the market for corporate control,the disposition effect and information superiority.The empirical study found that: ①The floating of non-tradable shares with large size is significantly lower than that with small size,but the market for corporate control does not significantly affect the proportion of floating;②Disposition effect is the main reason to affect the size of the floating of non-tradable shares,and in the process of market's side down,the influences become more pronounced,suggesting that the floating of non-tradable shares is greatly affected by the market sentiment;③In case that the disclosed performance of listed companies is lower than which analysts expected,the floating of non-tradable shares with large size is high before the disclosure,which implies that non-tradable shares with large size acting as insiders have some information superiority.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期109-119,共11页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"股权分置改革对我国资本市场和公司治理的影响研究"(批准号08BJY151)
关键词 大小非减持 控制权市场 处置效应 信息优势 the floating of non-tradable shares the market for corporate control the disposition effect information superiority
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Alon Brav, and Paul A. Gompers. The Role of Lockups in Initial Public Offerings [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2003, 16(1).
  • 2Dyck, A.,L. Zingales. Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparlson[J]. The Journal of Finance,2004, 59(2).
  • 3Francis A. Longstaff. How Much Can Marketability Affect Security Values [J]. The Journal of Finance,1995,50 (5).
  • 4Franks, and Mayer, Hostile. Takeovers and the Correction of Managerial Failure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996, 40(1).
  • 5Grossman, S. J., O. D. Hart. Takeover Bids, the Free Rider Problem and the Theory of the Corporation[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1950, 11 (1).
  • 6Healy P. M., and J. M. Wahlen. A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting[J]. Accounting Horizons, 1999, 13(4).
  • 7Jaffe, J. F. Special Information and Insider Trading[J]. Journal of Business, 1974, 47(3).
  • 8Jensen, and Rehuck. The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence [J], Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, 11(5).
  • 9J.D.Piotroski & D.T.Roulstone, Do lnaider Trades Reflect Both Contrarian Beliefs and Superior Knowledge about Future Cash Flow Realizations[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2005,39(1).
  • 10Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2).

二级参考文献206

共引文献2797

同被引文献346

引证文献25

二级引证文献248

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部