摘要
我国没有对经理权问题进行统一立法,《公司法》对经理问题的规定不足以应对现行司法实践的需要。对于经理权的性质,存在着代理权与代表权的争论,但两者在适用时都存在着不能满足商事代理特殊需要的问题。英美法系国家对经理权的态度是将其作为代理法的特殊问题进行处理。而大陆法系国家则通过区别论将经理与公司、经理与第三人之间的法律关系作了内外部的划分。将大陆法系的区别论加以适当的改造,对我国经理权法律制度的构建具有重要的借鉴意义。
Our country has no unified legislations on the problem of manager＇s right.The relevant regulations in Company Law can not respond to the existing judicial practice.For the nature of manager＇s right,there is a debate between the right of agency and representative,but neither of them can satisfy the special needs of commercial agency.Common law countries deal with it as a special case of agency law.And civil law countries divide the legal relationship between manager and company from the legal relationship between manager and the third party by the theory of separation.Reforming the theory of separation appropriately will have an important reference on the construction of the manager＇s right in China.
出处
《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》
2011年第1期58-62,共5页
Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
经理权
代理权说
代表权说
区别论
manager＇s right the right of agency the right of representative the theory of separation
