期刊文献+

中国权证市场的价格偏误及其均衡期权定价模型研究 被引量:4

Warrants Price Bias on China Security Market and a Research Based on the Equilibrium Pricing Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文使用Black-Scholas期权定价模型和EGARCH参数估计方法对中国权证市场的当前价格偏误情况进行了研究。结果显示,在引入创设机制后的2006年至2008年,中国权证市场的整体价格偏误程度依然较高,同时呈现出随权证市场价格下降而急剧上升的变化趋势。针对上述现象,本文通过理论推导提出了基于市场均衡条件下的期权定价模型,并以马钢CWB1认购权证为例实证检验了该模型的定价效果,最后得出忽略权证的价格泡沫、市场溢价和波动率估计误差是导致我国权证市场价格偏误较高的主要原因。 This paper uses the Black-Scholas option pricing model and EGARCH volatility estimation method to examine the price bias of warrants on China security market.The results show that after introduction of the covered warrants,the price bias of China warrants market is still huge,and more so when the warrant price decreases.Aimed to the significant price bias,this paper presents the market equilibrium option pricing model,and concludes that the negligence of price bubble,risk beta and volatility estimation errors is the main reason for the warrant price bias in China.Finally,the above conclusion is examined.
作者 代军
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第12期28-35,共8页 Management Review
基金 湖北省人文社科项目(2009q022)
关键词 价格偏误 EGARCH参数估计 均衡期权定价模型 pricing bias EGARCH volatility estimation method market equilibrium option pricing model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Krener P, Roenfeldt O. Warrant Pricing: Jump Diffusion vs. Black Scholas [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1993,28(2):255-272.
  • 2Schulz G. Trautmann S. Robustness of Option-like Warrant Valuation[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1994,18(5):841-859.
  • 3Mikami T. Investment Strategy: Convertible Bonds and Equity Warrants[C]. Tokyo: Berkeley Program in Finance in Asia Seminar, 1990.
  • 4Kuwahara H., Marsh A. The Pricing of Japanese Equity Warrants[J]. Management Science, 1992,38(11):1610-1641.
  • 5Veld C. Analysis of Equity Warrants as Investment and Finance Instruments [M]. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1992.
  • 6Sunti T. Warrant Pricing by Using Constant Elasticity Model, an Empirical Study in Thailand[R]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn Univer- sity, 2005.
  • 7周雷,楚晓玉.我国认股权证定价问题实证分析——以宝钢JTB1为例[J].价值工程,2007,26(8):134-137. 被引量:3
  • 8潘涛,邢铁英.中国权证定价方法的研究:基于经典B-S模型及GARCH修正模型比较的分析框架[J].世界经济,2007,30(6):75-80. 被引量:20
  • 9范为,陈宇.中国权证市场认购权证的价格偏误研究[J].管理学报,2008,5(3):407-412. 被引量:11
  • 10Germmill R., Thomas S. Warrants on the London Stock Exchange: Pricing Bias and Investor confusion[J]. European Finance Re- view, 1997,1(1):31-49.

二级参考文献31

  • 1李秉祥.对欧式期权B-S模型的推广[J].西安理工大学学报,2003,19(4):377-381. 被引量:12
  • 2李存行.认股权证的定价研究[J].统计与决策,2006,22(2):22-24. 被引量:21
  • 3[1]MITCHELL T.China Warrants Market Is Biggest[N].The Financial Times,2007-01-04.
  • 4[2]KREMER R,ROENFELDT O.Warrant Pricing:Jump-diffusion vs.Black-Scholes[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1993,28(2):255~272.
  • 5[3]SCHULZ G,TRAUTMANN S.Robustness of Option-like Warrant Valuation[J].Journal of Banking and Finance,1994,18(5):841~859.
  • 6[4]MIKAMI T.Investment Strategy:Convertible Bonds and Equity Warrants[C].Tokyo:Berkeley Program in Finance in Asia Seminar,1990.
  • 7[5]KUWAHARA H,MARSH A.The Pricing of Japanese Equity Warrant[J].Management Science,1992,38(11):1 610~1 641.
  • 8[6]VELD C.Analysis of Equity Warrants as Investment and Finance Instruments[M].Tilburg:Tilburg University Press,1992.
  • 9[7]SUNTI T.Warrant Pricing by Using Constant Elasticity Model,an Empirical Study in Thailand[R].Bangkok:Chulalongkorn University,2005.
  • 10[8]林海,郑振龙,彭博.股票波动率模型与认股权证定价[Z].厦门:厦门大学经济学院,2005.

共引文献27

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部