期刊文献+

亚健康评价指标体系的研究与建立 被引量:50

Analysis and Build-up for Sub-Health Evaluating Indicator System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的为编制亚健康评定量表,对亚健康评价指标体系进行条目分析与筛选,保留更可靠、更准确、更有代表性的条目,最终形成亚健康评定量表。方法应用由64个亚健康评价指标构成的自测问卷,选取2400名研究对象进行测试。采用"临界比率"法对评价指标进行分析;采用离散趋势法、相关系数法、因子分析法、主成分分析法、Cronbach′sAlpha系数法对指标进行筛选。结果除4个总体评价指标不参与分析外,所有指标临界比率的高分组和低分组得分间均存在统计学差异(P<0.01)。经6种方法筛选,最后保留39个亚健康评定指标。结论经条目分析和筛选,最终得到更简化、可靠、准确、具有代表性的亚健康评价指标,达到最初的设计要求,形成亚健康评定量表(第1版),但未来仍需对该量表的信度、效度做进一步检验。 Objective To analyze and screen the items about sub -health evaluation system, so as to keep the more reliable, accurate and representative versions for development of sub - health measurement scale (SHMS) . Methods Totally 2 400 participants were surveyed by using the 64 - item questionnaire. Critical Ratio (CR) method was used for items analysis. The methods of coefficient of variation, coefficient of correlation, factor analysis, principal component analysis and Cronbacb's Alpha coefficient were used to screen the 64 items. Results Score of each item in the questionnaire was statistically significantly different between the high - score - group and the low - score - group, except the overall evaluation indexes (P 〈 0. 01 ). After screened by the 6 methods, 39 sub - health items were retained in the final version. Conclusion After screened by the 6 methods, the finally obtained indexes for sub - health assessment are more simple, reliable, accurate and representative, and thus the Sub - Health Measurement Scale Version 1.0 ( SHMS V1.0) is established and it is up to the request of the initial design. However, the reliability and validity of the scale still need to be tested in the future.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期37-40,共4页 Chinese General Practice
基金 国家"863"计划(2008AA02Z409) 国家自然科学基金项目(30471481) 广东省科技计划项目(2009B080701073)
关键词 亚健康 量表 条目分析 条目筛选 Sub - health Scale Item analysis Item selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1袁云娥,吴小苏,谭燕.亚健康概念及其研究进展[J].中国医院,2004,8(4):55-59. 被引量:74
  • 2刘保延,何丽云,谢雁鸣.亚健康状态的概念研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2006,12(11):801-802. 被引量:97
  • 3张金华,许军,黄季萌,冯丽仪,罗仁.亚健康测量的定量化研究[J].广东医学,2009,30(11):1746-1748. 被引量:27
  • 4World Health Organization:Constitution of the World Health Organization[Z].Geneva:WHO,1948.
  • 5GAWRON V,FRENCH J,FUNKE D.An overview of fatigue[M].∥HANCOCK PA,DESMOND PA.Stress,workload,and fatigue.Human factors in transportation.Mahwah.NJ:Erlbaum,2001:581-595.
  • 6SMETSEM,GARSSEN B,BONKE B,et al.The Multidimen-sional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an in-strument to assess fatigue[J].J Psychosom Res,1995,39(3):315-325.
  • 7Jun Xu,Jinhua Zhang,Liyi Feng,et al.Self-rated health of population in southern China:association with socio-demographic characteristics measured with multiple-item self-rated health measurement scale[J].BMC Public Health,2010,10:393.
  • 8许军,张金华,罗仁,赵晓山,冯丽仪,丘金彩.Delphi法在筛选亚健康评价指标体系中的应用研究[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2010,19(6):562-565. 被引量:58
  • 9黄正南.医用多因素分析[M].3版,长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1995,5(3):47,48.
  • 10Kline E.Psychological Testing:A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation[Z].Sage,Newbury Park,97-99.

二级参考文献62

共引文献424

同被引文献443

引证文献50

二级引证文献266

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部