交互记忆系统与团队创造力关系的实证研究被引量：32

The relationship between transactive memory system and team creativity

导出

摘要交互记忆系统是团队知识认知研究的热点问题之一。本研究探讨了交互记忆系统对团队创造力的影响及其作用机制。实证研究结果表明,交互记忆系统的专门化和协调性维度对团队创造力存在积极影响;知识共享对交互记忆系统的协调性维度与团队创造力的关系起中介作用。本文为指导交互记忆系统的建设、促进团队创造力提供了理论依据。 Transactive memory system is a hot issue in the field of team cognitive research.The relationship between transactive memory system and team creativity is examined.The hypotheses are given and following results are found,that is,among the three dimension of transactive memory system（1） Specialization and coordination dimensions are positively related to the team creativity,but credibility dimension has nothing to do with team creativity.（2） Knowledge sharing mediated the relationship between the coordination and creativity.The implications of these results for research and practice were discussed.

作者王端旭薛会娟

机构地区浙江大学管理学院

出处《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期122-128,共7页 Science Research Management

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目:企业研发团队成员变动影响团队创造力的中介机制研究(70872098) 项目起止时间:2009.1-2011.12

关键词交互记忆系统知识共享团队创造力 transactive memory system knowledge sharing team creativity

分类号 C939 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Hollingshead A. B. Communication, learning, and retrieval in the transaetive memory system [ J]. Experiment Social Psychology, 1998, (34) : 423 -442.
2张钢,熊立.交互记忆系统与团队任务、成员异质性、团队绩效关系的实证研究[J].技术经济,2008,27(5):26-33. 被引量：21
3Liang D W. , Moreland R. L. and Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance : The mediating role of transactive memory[ J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995, 21 : 384 - 393.
4Moreland R. L. and Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of Group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? [ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000, 82:117 -133.
5Austin J. R. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance [ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88 (5) :866 - 878.
6Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88 : 587 - 604.
7张钢,熊立.交互记忆系统研究回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):840-845. 被引量：36
8Wegner D. M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind [ M]. New York: Springer- Verlag, 1987.
9Henry R. lmproving group judgment aceuracy:Information sharing and determining the best member[ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995,62 : 190 - 197.
10Lewis K. , Lange D. and Gillis L. , Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer[ J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(6) : 581 -600.

二级参考文献79

1张志学,Paul S.Hempel,韩玉兰,邱静.高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):271-280. 被引量：67
2张钢,熊立.交互记忆系统研究回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):840-845. 被引量：36
3Denison D R,Hart S L.Kahn J A.From chimneys to cross-functional teams:Developing and validating a diagnostic model.Academy of Management Journal,1996,39:1005 ～ 1023
4Sethi R,Smith D C,Park C.W.Cross-functional product development teams,creativity,and the innovativeness of new consumer products.Journal of Marketing Research,2001,38:73 ～ 85
5Guzzo R A,Dickson M W.Teams in organizations:Recent research on performance and effectiveness.Annual Review of Psychology,1996,47:307 ～ 338
6Hollingshead A B.Communication,learning and retrieval in transactive memory systems.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1998,34:423 ～442
7Liang D W,Moreland R L,Argote L.Group versus individual training and group performance:The mediating role of transactive memory.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1995,21:384～ 393
8Wegner D M,Erber R,Raymond P.Transactive memory in close relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1991,61:923 ～ 929
9Wegner D M.Transactive memory:A contemporary analysis of the group mind.In:Mullen B,Goethals G R (Eds.),Theories of group behavior.New York:Springer-Verlag,1987.185 ～ 208
10Moreland R L,Myaskovsky L.Exploring the performance benefits of group training:Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2000,82:117 ～ 133