期刊文献+

经颅电刺激运动诱发电位监测麻醉方法的建立 被引量:5

Establishment of anesthesia regimen for transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials monitoring in spine surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 对比相同麻醉深度下丙泊酚、七氟醚分别复合瑞芬太尼维持麻醉对经颅电刺激运动诱发电位(TES-MEPs)波幅和潜伏期的影响,以建立术中MEP监测时的适宜麻醉方法.方法 36例脊髓脊柱神经外科手术患者随机分为两组:丙泊酚麻醉组和七氟醚麻醉组,每组18例.对比麻醉诱导后30 min、60 min、90 min和120 min MEP的波幅和潜伏期.结果 两组病例麻醉期间血流动力学均维持稳定,组间脑电双频指数、呼气末二氧化碳分压和体温的差异均无统计学意义.丙泊酚组MEP所需阈刺激强度显著低于七氟醚组[(172±23)V:(217±42)V,P<0.05].丙泊酚组各时间点上肢MEP波幅显著高于七氟醚组(P<0.05),潜伏期显著短于七氟醚组(P<0.05).两组内各时间点上肢MEP波幅和潜伏期差异无统计学意义.结论 在相同麻醉深度下,丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉对MEP波幅的抑制作用显著优于七氟醚复合瑞芬太尼静吸复合麻醉方案,是用于脊髓脊柱手术TES-MEPs监测的适宜麻醉方法. Objective To compare the effects of propofol (PR) and sevoflurane (SR) combind with remifentanil on amplitudes and latency of TES-MEPs under equivalent anesthesia depth and to investigate optimal anesthesia regimen for TES-MEPs.Methods 36 patients undergoing spinal surgery were randomly divided into two groups: group PR (n=18) and group SR (n =18).After TES-MEPs monitoring system was established,the amplitudes and latencies of TES-MEPs at 30 min,60 min,90 min and 120 min after induced anesthesia were compared.Results There was no apparent fluctuation of heamodynamics and no significant difference in BIS,PEr CO2,and body temperature between the two groups.The minimal essential stimulus intensity in group PR was significant lower than that in group SR[(172±23) V: (217 ±42) V,P〈0.05].The amplitude of upper limb TES-MEPs in group PR was significant higher than that in group SR (P〈0.05),but the latency in group PR was significant shorter than that in group SR(P〈0.05).There was no significant difference in amplitude and latency at all time points in each group groups (P〉0.05).Conclusion Under equivalent anesthesia depth,the inhibition effects of propofol (3~4 μg/ml) with remifentanil (4 ng/ml) on amplitudes and latencies of TES-MEPs are Less significant than these of sevoflurane(0.7~0.8 MAC) with remifentanil(4 ng/ml).So propofol (3~4 μg/ml) with remifentanil (4ng/ml) is more compatible for TES-MEPs monitoring in spinal neurosurgery.
出处 《中华神经外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期1090-1093,共4页 Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery
基金 基金项目:北京市科委科技新星资助项目(2007B74) 北京市卫生系统高层次卫生人才队伍建设专项经费(2009-3-19)
关键词 运动诱发电位 神经外科 麻醉 七氟醚 丙泊酚 Motor evoked potentials Spinal surgery Anesthesia Sevoflurane Propofol
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献71

  • 1谢红雯,刘树山,吴承远,沙成,王大明,王长春,杨玉明,裴傲.急性脊髓损伤时经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位监测的实验研究[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(13):787-791. 被引量:3
  • 2李佛保,陈裕光,刘永恒,黄承达,陈立言,杨忠汉.皮层体感诱发电位(CSEP)在脊柱手术中的监护作用[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(11):768-771. 被引量:19
  • 3陈裕光,李佛保,彭新生,陈立言,万勇,傅明,廖威明.脊髓型颈椎病术中CSEP异常变化与手术相关因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(27):1891-1895. 被引量:14
  • 4Luk KD, Hu Y, Wong YW, et al. Evaluation of various evoked potential techniques for spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Spine, 2001, 26: 1772-1777.
  • 5Dawson EG, Sherman JE, Kanim LE, et al. Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine, 1991, 16(8 Suppl): 361-364.
  • 6Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, et al. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol, 2002, 113: 1082-1091.
  • 7Taniguchi M, Cedzieh C, Schramm J. Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery, 1993, 32: 219-226.
  • 8Burke D, Hicks R, Gandevia SC, et al. Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation. J Physiol, 1993, 470: 383-393.
  • 9Stephen JP, Sullivan MR, Hicks RG, et al. Cotrel-dubousset instrumentation in children using simultaneous motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. Spine, 1996, 21: 2450-2457.
  • 10Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Donnans JP, et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 2007, 89: 2440-2449.

共引文献68

同被引文献73

  • 1曹建国,周仁龙,张马忠,王珊娟,杭燕南.不同雷米芬太尼血浆靶控浓度实施气管插管的条件和心血管反应[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(4):219-221. 被引量:16
  • 2易杰,郝绒绒,罗爱伦,黄宇光.无肌松药下瑞芬太尼复合异丙酚靶控输注诱导病人气管插管的可行性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(4):293-295. 被引量:23
  • 3LIU Bai-yun,TIAN Yong-ji,LIU Wen,LIU Shu-ling,QIAO Hui,ZHANG Jun-ting,Jim Gui-jun.Intraoperative facial motor evoked potentials monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation for preservation of facial nerve function in patients with large acoustic neuroma[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(4):323-325. 被引量:10
  • 4Tanaka S,Tashiro T,Gomi A, et al. Sensitivity andspecificity in transcranial motor-evoked potentialmonitoring during neurosurgical operations [ J ]. SurgNeurul Int ,2011:111.
  • 5Weinzicrl MR,Reinacher P, Gilsbach JM,et al. Combinedmotor and somatosensory evoked potentials forintraoperative monitoring: intra-and postoperative data ina series of 69 operations[J]. Neurosurg Rev ,2007,30(2):109- 116.
  • 6Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, et al. Motor evokedpotential monitoring with supratentorial surgery [ J ].Neurosurgery,2004 ,54(5) : 1061 ~ 1072.
  • 7Fulkerson DH, Satyan KB, Wilder LM, et al.Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials invery young children [ J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr , 2011 ? 7?4):331 - 337.
  • 8Neuloh G,Schramm J. Monitoring of motor evokedpotentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentialsand microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebralaneurysm surgery [J]. J Neurosurg , 2004 , 100 ( 3 ) : 389-399.
  • 9Motoyama Y,Kawaguchi M, Yamada S, et al. Evaluationof combined use of transcranial and direct cortical motorevoked potential monitoring during unruptured aneurysmsurgery[J]. Neurol Med Chir ( Tokyo) , 2011 ,51(1):15-22.
  • 10Duffau H,Lopes M, Arthuis F, et al. Contribution ofintraoperative electrical stimulations in surgery of lowgrade gliomas: a comparative study between two serieswithoutC 1985 - 1996) and with( 1996 - 2003 ) functionalmapping in the same institution[J]. J Neurol NeurosurgPsychiatry ,2005 ,76(6) :845 - 851.

引证文献5

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部