期刊文献+

HDPE土工膜与无纺土工布界面剪切性能试验研究 被引量:11

HDPE GEOMEMBRANE-GEOTEXTILE INTERFACE SHEAR PROPERTIES DETERMINED BY LARGE SIZE DIRECT SHEAR TEST
原文传递
导出
摘要 该文采用大尺寸直剪仪,研究填埋场复合衬垫系统中,HDPE光面和糙面土工膜(GMs),在干燥、潮湿状态下与无纺土工布(GTs)界面剪切性能。试验结果表明,光面土工膜在较小的剪切位移即出现峰值强度,而糙面土工膜需要较大剪切位移才能出现峰值强度。不管是光面土工膜,还是糙面土工膜,与无纺土工布界面均具有明显的应变软化特性。糙面土工膜界面剪切强度比光面土工膜高,同一种界面,在潮湿状态下,由于吸力的存在,界面剪切强度比干燥状态下高。通过对界面剪切强度进行线性拟合,得出剪切强度参数,提出填埋场稳定性分析中,如果界面处于潮湿状态下,粘聚力可忽略不计。 This paper presents the interface shear properties between smooth and textured HDPE geomembranes(GMs) with geotextiles(GTs) by a large size direct shear test in dry and wet conditions,which are parts of the composite liner system of landfill.Experimental results show that the peak shear stresses occur at small displacements for smooth GMs with GTs while textured GMs with GTs need large displacements to reach the peak shear stresses.The strain softening behaviour is evident at the interfaces of both smooth GMs and textured GMs with GTs.The shear strength of textured GMs are higher than that of smooth GMs.Due to the suction effect between the GM-GT interfaces,in the wet condition displayed higher peak stresses than those corresponding to dry condition.The interface shear strength parameters are obtained by a straight line approximation.It is proposed that the cohesion parameter could be ignored in the landfill stability analysis if the interface in wet conditions.
作者 肖朝昀 涂帆
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期186-191,共6页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 福建省青年基金项目(2009J05126) 厦门市科技局项目(3502Z20083042)
关键词 大尺寸直剪实验 复合衬垫系统 HDPE土工膜 土工布 剪切强度 应变软化 large size direct shear test composite liner system HDPE geomembrane geotextile shear strength strain softening behaviour
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1钱学德,郭志平.填埋场复合衬垫系统[J].水利水电科技进展,1997,17(5):64-68. 被引量:15
  • 2Koerner R M,Soong T-Y.Stability assessment of ten large landfill failures [C]// Proc.,Sessions of GeoDenver,Advances in Transportation and Geoenvironmental Systems Using Geosynthetics.Denver:ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication,2000:1-38.
  • 3林伟岸,詹良通,陈云敏.HDPE土工膜/土工织物界面剪切特性[C]//中国土木工程学会第十届土力学及岩土工程学术会议论文集.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2007:720-724.
  • 4Mitchell J K,Seed R B.Kettleman hills waste landfill slope failure.I:line-system properties [J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1990,116(4):647-668.
  • 5Jones D R V,Dixon N.Shear strength properties of geomembrane-geotextile interfaces [J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes,1998,16(1):45-71.
  • 6Wasti Y,Bahadmr Z.Geomembrane-geotextile interface shear properties as determined by inclined board and direct shear box tests [J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2001,19(1):45-57.
  • 7Bergado D T,Ramana G V.Evaluation of interface shear strength of composite liner system and stability analysis for a landfill lining system in Thailand [J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2006,24(6):371- 393.
  • 8Hebeler G L,Frost J D,Myers A T.Quantifying hook and loop interaction in textured geomembrane-geotextile systems [J].Geomembrane and Geotextile,2005,23(1):77-105.
  • 9Stark T D,Williamson T A.HDPE geomembrane/ geotextile interface shear strength [J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1996,122(3):197-203.
  • 10ASTM D5321,Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method [S].2002.

共引文献14

同被引文献87

引证文献11

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部