摘要
目的:比较分析不同镇痛分娩方法的临床效果及对产妇和新生儿的影响。方法:随机选取2009年4月至2010年4月在本院分娩480例产妇,随机分为A、B、C组,每组160例。A组产妇采用腰硬联合麻醉(腰硬联合麻醉组):B组吸入含50%笑气(氧化亚氮)和150%氧气的混合气体(笑气组);C组为空白对照。分别观察各组的镇痛效果、产程时间等。结果:A、B组有效率均明显高于C组,A组有效率均明显高于B组;差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组产妇各产程时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:笑气吸入的镇痛效果虽然稍次于自控硬膜外镇痛组,但经济、方便简单,安全可靠,无明显不良反应,值得基层医院临床广泛推广;腰硬联合麻醉镇痛起效迅速、效果最佳,对产妇及新生儿无明显副作用,可作为分娩镇痛的首选方法。
Objective： Comparative analysis of different delivery method to the clinical analgesic effect and the impact on maternal and newborn. Methods： Randomly selected from April 2009 to April 2010 480 patients in the hospital delivery, were randomly divided into A, B, C group （n=160 cases）. Group A of maternal use of epidural anesthesia. Group B with 50% nitrous oxide inhalationand 50% in oxygen. Group C as control group. Results： Group A, B was significantly higher than the group C effectively. Group A was significantly higher than the effective rate of group B; differences were statistically significant. Three groups were compared the difference in labor time were not statistically significant.Conclusion： Although the analgesic effect of nitrous oxide is slightly inferior to epidural analgesia group, but the economic, convenient and simple, safe, reliable, no significant adverse reactions, it is widely Primary Clinical; lumbar epidural anesthesia rapid onset of analgesia, best, no significant maternal and neonatal side effects, can be used as the preferred method of labor analgesia.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2011年第1期27-28,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
分娩镇痛
腰硬联合麻醉镇痛
笑气镇痛
Analgesia
Lumbar epidural anesthesia
Nitrous oxide analgesia
