期刊文献+

SIRS评分和APACHEⅡ评分对急性胰腺炎患者预后评估及其临床价值 被引量:7

Prognostic Evaluation on SIRS and APACHEⅡ in Acute Pancreatitis Patients of Emergency and its Clinical Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)评分与急性生理和慢性健康状况(APACHEⅡ)评分对预测急性胰腺炎患者预后的价值。方法回顾分析202例急性胰腺炎患者的临床资料,记录患者的一般情况、预后。根据预后将患者分为死亡组16例和存活组186例,对两组患者的SIRS和APACHEⅡ评分进行比较。结果死亡组SIRS评分、APACHEⅡ评分均高于存活组(P<0.05)。随着SIRS与APACHEⅡ分值的增加,病死率也增加。SIRS评分≥2分或APACHEⅡ评分≥20分时病死率明显增加(P<0.05)。两种评分方法具有一致性,均可用于急诊急性胰腺炎患者的预后评估(Kappa值=0.33,P=0.001)。结论 SIRS和APACHEⅡ两个评分系统均可用于评估急性胰腺炎患者的预后。 Objective To investigate the efectiveness of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)and APACHEII in the prognostic evaluation of patients with acute pancreatitis of emergency. Methods A total of 202 patients with acute pancreatitis of emergency were enrolled in our study. General condition, the prognosis as well as SIRS and APACHEⅡ scores within 24 hours after admission were evaluated and recorded. All the patients were divided into survival group and death group according to the prognosis. The value of SIRS and APACHEⅡ scores were compared statistically between the two groups. Results There was a significant diference in SIRS and APACHE Ⅱ scores between the two groups(P 〈0.05) ,and the two systems were consistent with each other in the evaluation(P 〈0.05). Conclusion SIRS and APACHE Ⅱ systems are both valuable in the prognostic evaluation of patients with acute pancreatitis of emergency.
出处 《广西医学》 CAS 2011年第1期32-34,共3页 Guangxi Medical Journal
关键词 胰腺炎 SIRS评分 APACHE Ⅱ评分 预后 临床价值 Systemic inflanmmtory response syndrome scores APACHEⅡ scores Emergency Acute pancreafitis Prognosis Clinical value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献31

共引文献2514

同被引文献55

  • 1黄德弘,侯铁英.脑出血患者医院感染危险因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2004,14(9):993-995. 被引量:31
  • 2沈明强,邵国富.急性卒中的血压管理[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2006,14(5):365-367. 被引量:11
  • 3于成功,吴寒.质子泵抑制剂的临床应用与研究进展[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2007,24(1):74-75. 被引量:37
  • 4张圣道,雷若庆.重症急性胰腺炎诊治指南[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(11):727-729. 被引量:1148
  • 5李俊芬,秦俭,吴伟,赵曲川,翟文亮.SIRS评分和APACHEⅡ评分对急诊ICU老年下呼吸道感染患者预后评估的探讨[J].中国急救医学,2007,27(7):599-600. 被引量:13
  • 6Bone R C, Balk R A, Cerra F B, et al. Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in Sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society ofCritical Care Medicine[ J ]. Chest, 1992, 101(6):1644-1655.
  • 7陈灏珠,林果为.实用内科学下[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.
  • 8Malone D L, Kuhls D, Napolitano L M, et al. Back to Basics Validation of the Admission Systemic Inflammatory Re- sponse Syndrome Score in Predicting Outcome in Trauma[ J ] J Trauma,2001, 51(3): 458-463.
  • 9Knotzer H, Pajk W, Dtinser M W, et al. Regional Microvas- cular Function and Vascular Reactivity in Patients with Dif- ferent Degrees of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome[ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2006, 102(4): 1187-1193.
  • 10Bochicchio G V, Napolitano L M, Joshi M, et al. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Score at Admission Inde- pendently Predicts Infection in Blunt Trauma Patients[ J ]. J Trauma, 2001, 50(5):817-820.

引证文献7

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部