期刊文献+

ⅤⅥ型起搏器治疗Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞疗效观察 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨ⅤⅥ型起搏器治疗Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞(AVB)的临床疗效。方法采用ⅤⅥ型起搏器,对36例心功能NYHA分级Ⅱ~Ⅳ级的Ⅲ度AVB患者行右室心尖部或右室间隔起搏治疗,术前及术后12个月用心脏彩超检测其左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室短轴缩短率(FS)、每搏输出量(SV)、心输出(CO)、心脏指数(CI),并行6 min步行试验(6-MWD)。结果患者均顺利完成置入手术,随访12~24个月,术后症状明显改善,生活质量提高,无严重置入起搏器相关并发症发生。与术前比较,患者心功能改善,CO、CI增加(P均<0.05);EF、FS、SV下降,6-MWD改善,但无统计学差异(P均﹥0.05)。结论Ⅲ度AVB患者行ⅤⅥ型起搏器治疗后CO、CI增加,活动耐量及生活质量提高。
机构地区 贵港市人民医院
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第5期59-61,共3页 Shandong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Mohan JC,Sethi KK,Arora R,et al.Comparative evaluation of left ventricular function in sick sinus syndrome on different long term pacing modes[J].Indian Heart J,1994,46(7):303.
  • 2巩雪,宿燕岗,潘文志,崔洁,舒先红,陈松文,孙敏敏,刘少稳,葛均波.右室流出道与右室心尖部起搏对心脏收缩功能和左室重构的影响[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2009,23(3):212-214. 被引量:17
  • 3任晓庆,张澍,浦介麟,王方正.长期右室心尖部起搏对心室重构及心功能的影响[J].透析与人工器官,2009,20(4):5-7. 被引量:3
  • 4Nielsen J,Bottcher M,Nielsen TT,et al.Regionalmyocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing effect of pacing mode and rate[J].Journal of the American College of Cardiology,2000,35(6):1453-1461.
  • 5Forster C.Interaction of 5-methylurapidil with alpha1adrenoceptors in canine blood vessels:impact of pacing induced heart failure[J].Eur J Pharmacol,1996,3186(11):55.
  • 6寿锡凌,吉海鸣,崔翰斌,陈新义,梁磊,官功昌,樊应书.Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞患者安置双腔起搏器初期起搏模式的选择[J].心脏杂志,2006,18(1):83-86. 被引量:1
  • 7Chon JC,Pachon EI,Alboronoz RN.Ventricular endocardial right bifocal stimulation in the treatment of severe dilated cardiomyopathy heart failure with wide QRS[J].Pacing Clin Elctrophysiol,2001,24(9Pt1):1369-1376.

二级参考文献23

  • 1史浩颖,汪芳,孟伟栋,张峰,孙雅萍,孙宝贵.组织多普勒评价右室不同部位起搏对左室收缩功能和同步性的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(11):1002-1005. 被引量:42
  • 2Dipla K,Mattiello JA,Jeevanandam V,et al.Myocyte recovery after mechanical circulatory support in humans with end-stage heart failure[J].Circulation,1998,97:2316-2322.
  • 3Bakker PF,Meijburg H,De Torge N,et al.Beneficial effects of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure(abstr)[J].PACE,1994,17:820-828.
  • 4Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function [ J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997,29 : 744
  • 5Yu CM, Fung WH, Lin H, et al. Predictors of left ventrieular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2003,91:684
  • 6de Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: A quantitative review [ J ]. Europace, 2003, 5:275
  • 7Stambler BS, Ellenbogen K, Zhang X, et al. Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation [ J ]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2003, 14:1 180
  • 8Victor F, Mabo P, Mansour H,et al. A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2006, 17:238
  • 9Tse HF, Yu C, Wong KK, et al. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: The effect of sites of electrical stimulation[ J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002, 40 : 1 451
  • 10Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS. Heart failure during cardiac pacing [ J ]. Circulation, 2006, 113:2 082

共引文献18

同被引文献56

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部