摘要
WTO争端解决机制被喻为WTO乌拉圭回合谈判成果中的"皇冠上的宝石"和WTO多边贸易体系的"枢纽",可见争端解决机制是整个WTO法律体系的核心。在WTO争端解决机制中,报复制度作为救济措施之一,长期以来,因其自身所存在的诸多缺陷而备受争议,WTO成员及学者也为此提出了许多改革建议。从实践功能及文本规定两方面分析了报复制度所存在的缺陷,并对WTO成员及学者对其所提出的改革建议进行了评价。
The WTO dispute settlement mechanism has been hailed as ＂crown jewel＂ of the achievements of the Uruguay Round Negotiation and ＂linchpin＂ of WTO multilateral trading system,so it is obvious that WTO dispute settlement mechanism is the core of the WTO legal system.In the WTO dispute settlement process,the appropriateness of retaliation,which is one of the remedies,has increasingly come under scrutiny in recent years.Several WTO members and scholars have put forward some proposals aimed at improving and clarifying the retaliation system under the DSU.This paper will try to examine and analyse the drawbacks of the existing retaliation system not only from practical angle but also textual angle.More significantly,this paper will sum up the reform proposals and give comments on them.
出处
《湖南财政经济学院学报》
2011年第1期78-83,共6页
Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics
